Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

aluminiumpark.com

AluminiumPark - Aluminium Tile Trims - Tile Edge trim‎AluminiumPark - Aluminium Tile Trims - Tile Edge trim

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

417 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

697 ms

aluminiumpark.com screenshot

About Website

Visit aluminiumpark.com now to see the best up-to-date Aluminium Park content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about aluminiumpark.com

AluminiumPark - Aluminium Tile Trims - Tile Edge trim‎Aluminium Tile Trim, Flooring profile, Finishing profiles, Edge Trim, stair nosings, Ceramic Edge Trim

Visit aluminiumpark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Aluminiumpark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 417 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

aluminiumpark.com performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,630 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value2.19

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.4 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aluminiumpark.com

417 ms

aluminiumpark.com

542 ms

www.aluminiumpark.com

767 ms

bootstrap.min.css

134 ms

normalize.css

265 ms

Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Aluminiumpark.com, 8% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Aluminiumpark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 175.9 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

944.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Aluminiumpark.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 603.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 96.6 kB

  • Original 106.3 kB
  • After minification 50.0 kB
  • After compression 9.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 56.3 kB, which is 53% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.6 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 15.0 kB

  • Original 603.7 kB
  • After minification 588.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Aluminium Park images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 55.7 kB

  • Original 349.4 kB
  • After minification 349.4 kB
  • After compression 293.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 55.7 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 60.4 kB
  • After minification 59.7 kB
  • After compression 51.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aluminiumpark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (36%)

Requests Now

96

After Optimization

61

The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aluminium Park. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

aluminiumpark.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

aluminiumpark.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

aluminiumpark.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aluminiumpark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Aluminiumpark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Aluminium Park. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: