Tools & Wizards About Us
amartextile.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

amartextile.in

supplier and manufacturer of curtains,domestic mosquito net in amritsar

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

851 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

171 ms

amartextile.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Amartextile content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about amartextile.in

amartextile maunfacturing unit,curtains,mosquito net,sofa backs,lining,table cloth amritsar,punjab,india.

Visit amartextile.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Amartextile.in page load time and found that the first response time was 851 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

amartextile.in performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.201

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

amartextile.in

851 ms

reset.css

385 ms

layout.css

392 ms

style.css

397 ms

jquery-1.5.2.js

1183 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Amartextile.in and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Amartextile.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 353.8 kB (32%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

742.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Amartextile.in main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 703.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 17.8 kB

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 18.8 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 35.4 kB

  • Original 703.5 kB
  • After minification 668.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Amartextile images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 292.7 kB

  • Original 360.9 kB
  • After minification 256.4 kB
  • After compression 68.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 292.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 11.0 kB
  • After minification 9.3 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Amartextile.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 71% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (10%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

71

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Amartextile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

amartextile.in

amartextile.in

851 ms

reset.css

reset.css

385 ms

layout.css

layout.css

392 ms

style.css

style.css

397 ms

jquery-1.5.2.js

jquery-1.5.2.js

1183 ms

cufon-yui.js

cufon-yui.js

595 ms

cufon-replace.js

cufon-replace.js

415 ms

Terminal_Dosis_300.font.js

Terminal_Dosis_300.font.js

964 ms

atooltip.jquery.js

atooltip.jquery.js

587 ms

roundabout.js

roundabout.js

593 ms

roundabout_shapes.js

roundabout_shapes.js

625 ms

jquery.easing.1.2.js

jquery.easing.1.2.js

782 ms

script.js

script.js

790 ms

bg_img2.jpg

bg_img2.jpg

420 ms

bg_top_repeat.jpg

bg_top_repeat.jpg

197 ms

bg_top_img.jpg

bg_top_img.jpg

386 ms

menu_marker.png

menu_marker.png

200 ms

mos2.jpg

mos2.jpg

200 ms

mos10.jpg

mos10.jpg

602 ms

mos12.jpg

mos12.jpg

603 ms

line_ver1.gif

line_ver1.gif

406 ms

line_ver2.png

line_ver2.png

405 ms

31.jpg

31.jpg

582 ms

79.jpg

79.jpg

606 ms

22.jpg

22.jpg

606 ms

24.jpg

24.jpg

637 ms

25.jpg

25.jpg

784 ms

26.jpg

26.jpg

812 ms

27.jpg

27.jpg

810 ms

28.jpg

28.jpg

816 ms

29.jpg

29.jpg

815 ms

30.jpg

30.jpg

853 ms

32.jpg

32.jpg

975 ms

36.jpg

36.jpg

1006 ms

34.jpg

34.jpg

1010 ms

35.jpg

35.jpg

1012 ms

37.jpg

37.jpg

1013 ms

38.jpg

38.jpg

1063 ms

39.jpg

39.jpg

1170 ms

40.jpg

40.jpg

1201 ms

41.jpg

41.jpg

1208 ms

42.jpg

42.jpg

1209 ms

43.jpg

43.jpg

1210 ms

44.jpg

44.jpg

1272 ms

45.jpg

45.jpg

1361 ms

46.jpg

46.jpg

1399 ms

47.jpg

47.jpg

1406 ms

48.jpg

48.jpg

1406 ms

51.jpg

51.jpg

1392 ms

50.jpg

50.jpg

1292 ms

52.jpg

52.jpg

1358 ms

53.jpg

53.jpg

1399 ms

54.jpg

54.jpg

1225 ms

55.jpg

55.jpg

1203 ms

56.jpg

56.jpg

1216 ms

57.jpg

57.jpg

1279 ms

58.jpg

58.jpg

1167 ms

59.jpg

59.jpg

1194 ms

60.jpg

60.jpg

1203 ms

61.jpg

61.jpg

1202 ms

62.jpg

62.jpg

1213 ms

63.jpg

63.jpg

1270 ms

64.jpg

64.jpg

1157 ms

65.jpg

65.jpg

1181 ms

66.jpg

66.jpg

1191 ms

67.jpg

67.jpg

1191 ms

68.jpg

68.jpg

1208 ms

69.jpg

69.jpg

1263 ms

70.jpg

70.jpg

1157 ms

71.jpg

71.jpg

1180 ms

72.jpg

72.jpg

1190 ms

73.jpg

73.jpg

1192 ms

74.jpg

74.jpg

1209 ms

75.jpg

75.jpg

1262 ms

76.jpg

76.jpg

1153 ms

77.jpg

77.jpg

1181 ms

78.jpg

78.jpg

1189 ms

80.jpg

80.jpg

1193 ms

81.jpg

81.jpg

1210 ms

83.jpg

83.jpg

1244 ms

Accessibility Review

amartextile.in accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

amartextile.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

amartextile.in SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Amartextile.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Amartextile.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

amartextile.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Amartextile. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: