4.2 sec in total
53 ms
4 sec
167 ms
Welcome to ambacar.ec homepage info - get ready to check Ambacar best content for Ecuador right away, or after learning these important things about ambacar.ec
En los concesionarios Ambacar cotiza, haz un test drive y compra tú auto nuevo Great Wall, Haval o Shineray con extras incluídos. Seminuevos garantizados.
Visit ambacar.ecWe analyzed Ambacar.ec page load time and found that the first response time was 53 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
ambacar.ec performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
24/100
10%
Value18.0 s
0/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value1,850 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.216
58/100
15%
Value18.9 s
3/100
10%
53 ms
355 ms
480 ms
29 ms
254 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Ambacar.ec, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Static.hotjar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Ambacar.ec.
Page size can be reduced by 262.8 kB (52%)
505.3 kB
242.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Ambacar.ec main page is 505.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 298.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 262.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 262.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ambacar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (77%)
74
17
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ambacar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ambacar.ec
53 ms
ambacar.ec
355 ms
www.ambacar.ec
480 ms
jquery.min.js
29 ms
wp-rest-filter-public-fe12ecf45e2d54ef6de1c9bc3dc38a84.js
254 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
442 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1021 ms
plugins.min.js
1316 ms
jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js
255 ms
js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js
255 ms
public-66a127ac6769611551f562df86830d08.js
256 ms
quicktags.min.js
250 ms
hooks.min.js
250 ms
i18n.min.js
249 ms
index-c6e71d0dc974aae843ce24b794df59de.js
254 ms
index-ff5be58a7f535d0bf95c33f72bbcdcce.js
253 ms
image-map-pro.min.js
254 ms
wpcf7r-fe-4e4a602eecdea9e58219e72ca1eb19d9.js
265 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker-160df1ead3753bee202e2331d14f02f2.js
315 ms
valida-documento-identificacion-min.js
1827 ms
jquery.fancybox-min.js
2464 ms
main-min.js
2981 ms
lazysizes.min.js
437 ms
ls.unveilhooks.min.js
452 ms
ls.native-loading.min.js
474 ms
ubermenu.min.js
492 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
507 ms
masterslider.min.js
525 ms
hotjar-1137924.js
300 ms
gtm.js
299 ms
logo.png
342 ms
blank.gif
358 ms
Camioneta-KYC_F3_Oferta_pick-up_Ambacar.jpg
383 ms
ambacar-ofertas-entrega-inmediata-2022.jpg
399 ms
OFERTAS-webpx.jpg
417 ms
boton-cotizador.gif
435 ms
css
71 ms
frontend-ed503f65bcc5b2004cc84e2128016917.css
451 ms
style.min.css
468 ms
styles-7375296526b4b1b3c71bd4c38340d322.css
483 ms
image-map-pro.min.css
501 ms
style-e47076a221298fe8669b767e8feef79e.css
518 ms
wp-rest-filter-public.css
537 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css
522 ms
pagenavi-css-f6ffc0ba83c6752ede20aab910fd8430.css
543 ms
header-footer-elementor-aa04ae339cfe828d1aa27b1fee68bfee.css
554 ms
custom-frontend-lite.min.css
569 ms
v2.zopim.com
43 ms
swiper.min.css
575 ms
post-709414-a74710eb95e81116c370d32eac36e01e.css
588 ms
custom-pro-frontend-lite.min.css
601 ms
global-466b21875640eb78383af363e45caef3.css
612 ms
style-652a23f39bc4f6b43f848d158a62f820.css
625 ms
bootstrap.min.css
639 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
644 ms
asset_composer.js
45 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
22 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
31 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
36 ms
normalize-a5f12d0b2fc45692de66668d78c8c159.css
629 ms
font-awesome.min.css
523 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
533 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
522 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
523 ms
main-min.css
513 ms
commons.main-9bf8b58a4f025256e14c71676378c9b6.css
526 ms
masterslider.main-e674bbd7cf7398f99911e79b0469669e.css
514 ms
custom-ea041023217a48916f673b55b43dd280.css
498 ms
ubermenu.min.css
486 ms
trans_black-c9a2fa62d3e2a43847a32ae6f9e39997.css
465 ms
fontawesome.min.css
527 ms
solid.min.css
515 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
502 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
479 ms
shopping-cart-red.svg
462 ms
map-red.svg
473 ms
tool-red.svg
453 ms
money-red.svg
439 ms
testimonials-red.svg
426 ms
telephone-red.svg
408 ms
chat-red.svg
387 ms
whatsapp-red.svg
139 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
19 ms
loading-2.gif
66 ms
ambacar.ec accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ambacar.ec best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ambacar.ec SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ambacar.ec can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ambacar.ec main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ambacar.ec
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ambacar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: