Tools & Wizards About Us
anaphylaxistalk.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

anaphylaxistalk.com

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

478 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

187 ms

anaphylaxistalk.com screenshot

About Website

Visit anaphylaxistalk.com now to see the best up-to-date Anaphylaxistalk content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about anaphylaxistalk.com

Visit anaphylaxistalk.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Anaphylaxistalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 478 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

anaphylaxistalk.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.anaphylaxistalk.com

478 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

92 ms

pagenavi-css.css

155 ms

bootstrap.min.css

174 ms

font-awesome.min.css

159 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Anaphylaxistalk.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (478 ms) belongs to the original domain Anaphylaxistalk.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 509.4 kB (60%)

Content Size

844.2 kB

After Optimization

334.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Anaphylaxistalk.com main page is 844.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 329.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 14.1 kB

  • Original 19.0 kB
  • After minification 17.4 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.1 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 14.1 kB

  • Original 177.8 kB
  • After minification 163.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Anaphylaxistalk images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 219.7 kB

  • Original 329.6 kB
  • After minification 325.3 kB
  • After compression 109.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 219.7 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 261.5 kB

  • Original 317.8 kB
  • After minification 288.7 kB
  • After compression 56.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Anaphylaxistalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 261.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (83%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Anaphylaxistalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.anaphylaxistalk.com

www.anaphylaxistalk.com

478 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

92 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

155 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

174 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

159 ms

style.css

style.css

165 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

237 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

169 ms

tether.min.js

tether.min.js

254 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

248 ms

theme-script.js

theme-script.js

250 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

248 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

252 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

167 ms

SEO Factors

anaphylaxistalk.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Anaphylaxistalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Anaphylaxistalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

anaphylaxistalk.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Anaphylaxistalk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: