Tools & Wizards About Us
andrewhugill.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

andrewhugill.com

Andrew Hugill

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

373 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

385 ms

andrewhugill.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to andrewhugill.com homepage info - get ready to check Andrew Hugill best content for Norway right away, or after learning these important things about andrewhugill.com

Personal web site

Visit andrewhugill.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Andrewhugill.com page load time and found that the first response time was 373 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

andrewhugill.com performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

78/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.199

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

77/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

andrewhugill.com

373 ms

css

46 ms

linearicons.css

338 ms

font-awesome.min.css

651 ms

bootstrap.css

682 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Andrewhugill.com, 15% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Andrewhugill.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 169.8 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Andrewhugill.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 12.3 kB

  • Original 15.3 kB
  • After minification 10.4 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.9 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 121.9 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 987.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Andrew Hugill needs image optimization as it can save up to 121.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 17.8 kB

  • Original 189.1 kB
  • After minification 188.9 kB
  • After compression 171.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 17.9 kB

  • Original 62.3 kB
  • After minification 62.3 kB
  • After compression 44.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Andrewhugill.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.9 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (68%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Andrew Hugill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

andrewhugill.com

andrewhugill.com

373 ms

css

css

46 ms

linearicons.css

linearicons.css

338 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

651 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

682 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

663 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

652 ms

nice-select.css

nice-select.css

664 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

703 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

984 ms

main.css

main.css

1017 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

673 ms

Hugillhero.jpg

Hugillhero.jpg

712 ms

Andrew_mic.jpg

Andrew_mic.jpg

733 ms

digitalsyzygies.jpeg

digitalsyzygies.jpeg

758 ms

preview.png

preview.png

713 ms

spectrum.jpg

spectrum.jpg

745 ms

auraldiversity.jpg

auraldiversity.jpg

762 ms

vauxhall.png

vauxhall.png

782 ms

Andrew_Hugill_performing_300.jpg

Andrew_Hugill_performing_300.jpg

756 ms

spectrum.png

spectrum.png

780 ms

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

1097 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

1095 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1114 ms

js

js

64 ms

easing.min.js

easing.min.js

1114 ms

hoverIntent.js

hoverIntent.js

1299 ms

superfish.min.js

superfish.min.js

1327 ms

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

1405 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1404 ms

jquery.tabs.min.js

jquery.tabs.min.js

1423 ms

jquery.nice-select.min.js

jquery.nice-select.min.js

1421 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

1620 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1653 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

1733 ms

simple-skillbar.js

simple-skillbar.js

1730 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1744 ms

mail-script.js

mail-script.js

1741 ms

main.js

main.js

2121 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

19 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

31 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

35 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

50 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

49 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

50 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

49 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1096 ms

Accessibility Review

andrewhugill.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

andrewhugill.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

andrewhugill.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ZX

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Andrewhugill.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Andrewhugill.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

andrewhugill.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Andrew Hugill. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: