Tools & Wizards About Us
angstec.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

angstec.com

Angstrom Sun Technologies Inc. |

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

115 ms

Resources Loaded

886 ms

Page Rendered

483 ms

angstec.com screenshot

About Website

Visit angstec.com now to see the best up-to-date Angstec content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about angstec.com

Angstrom Sun Technologies Inc.

Visit angstec.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Angstec.com page load time and found that the first response time was 115 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

angstec.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.769

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

angstec.com

115 ms

www.angstec.com

120 ms

style.css

176 ms

jquery.min.js

223 ms

facebox.js

183 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Angstec.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (325 ms) belongs to the original domain Angstec.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 410.8 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Angstec.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 29.3 kB

  • Original 40.7 kB
  • After minification 40.1 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.3 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 370.7 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Angstec needs image optimization as it can save up to 370.7 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 83.8 kB
  • After minification 83.4 kB
  • After compression 75.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 15.3 kB
  • After minification 15.3 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Angstec.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (57%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Angstec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

angstec.com

angstec.com

115 ms

www.angstec.com

www.angstec.com

120 ms

style.css

style.css

176 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

223 ms

facebox.js

facebox.js

183 ms

javascript.js

javascript.js

183 ms

jquery.jcarousel.min.js

jquery.jcarousel.min.js

189 ms

cycle-plugin.js

cycle-plugin.js

189 ms

modernizr.custom.17475.js

modernizr.custom.17475.js

209 ms

marquee.js

marquee.js

215 ms

responsiveslides.css

responsiveslides.css

216 ms

themes.css

themes.css

223 ms

responsiveslides.min.js

responsiveslides.min.js

223 ms

js

js

78 ms

menu.js

menu.js

241 ms

main.css

main.css

77 ms

skin.css

skin.css

76 ms

format.css

format.css

82 ms

facebox.css

facebox.css

84 ms

jquery.selectbox.css

jquery.selectbox.css

84 ms

nav.css

nav.css

101 ms

elastislide.css

elastislide.css

111 ms

media.css

media.css

109 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

123 ms

headbg.jpg

headbg.jpg

118 ms

logo.png

logo.png

121 ms

title.png

title.png

124 ms

navbg.jpg

navbg.jpg

119 ms

seprater.png

seprater.png

120 ms

lefttab.png

lefttab.png

118 ms

righttab.png

righttab.png

120 ms

ulbg2.jpg

ulbg2.jpg

121 ms

circle_red.png

circle_red.png

122 ms

TFProbe%20Ellipsometer%20Reflectomter%20Microspectrophotometer.png

TFProbe%20Ellipsometer%20Reflectomter%20Microspectrophotometer.png

147 ms

banertext.png

banertext.png

147 ms

Spectroscopic%20Ellipsometer%20SE200BAC.png

Spectroscopic%20Ellipsometer%20SE200BAC.png

191 ms

Spectroscopic%20Reflectometer%20slide3.png

Spectroscopic%20Reflectometer%20slide3.png

288 ms

Microspectrophotometer%20slide4.png

Microspectrophotometer%20slide4.png

221 ms

TFProbe%20Reflectometer%20Inline.png

TFProbe%20Reflectometer%20Inline.png

223 ms

Spectroscopic-Ellipsometer-SE200BM-M450.jpg

Spectroscopic-Ellipsometer-SE200BM-M450.jpg

219 ms

Spectroscopic-Ellipsometer-.gif

Spectroscopic-Ellipsometer-.gif

251 ms

Ellipsometer%20Reflectometer%20photovoltaic%20Solar%20Application%20.jpg

Ellipsometer%20Reflectometer%20photovoltaic%20Solar%20Application%20.jpg

225 ms

TFProbe_Wafer_Loader_Web.png

TFProbe_Wafer_Loader_Web.png

317 ms

TFProbe_MSP_AutoLoader_484.png

TFProbe_MSP_AutoLoader_484.png

325 ms

slideshadow.png

slideshadow.png

256 ms

fbg.jpg

fbg.jpg

259 ms

helpfull.png

helpfull.png

284 ms

contact.png

contact.png

290 ms

helveticaltcondensedmedium.woff

helveticaltcondensedmedium.woff

172 ms

helveticaltcondensedbold.woff

helveticaltcondensedbold.woff

198 ms

collect

collect

50 ms

border.jpg

border.jpg

172 ms

listingarrow.png

listingarrow.png

176 ms

Accessibility Review

angstec.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

angstec.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

angstec.com SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Angstec.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Angstec.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

angstec.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Angstec. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: