2.8 sec in total
217 ms
1.6 sec
1 sec
Welcome to animaltattle.com homepage info - get ready to check Animaltattle best content right away, or after learning these important things about animaltattle.com
This domain may be for sale!
Visit animaltattle.comWe analyzed Animaltattle.com page load time and found that the first response time was 217 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
animaltattle.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value5.1 s
26/100
25%
Value5.5 s
54/100
10%
Value380 ms
70/100
30%
Value0.267
46/100
15%
Value4.9 s
77/100
10%
217 ms
523 ms
30 ms
57 ms
56 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Animaltattle.com, 13% (5 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 13% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (523 ms) belongs to the original domain Animaltattle.com.
Page size can be reduced by 194.2 kB (35%)
552.7 kB
358.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Animaltattle.com main page is 552.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 255.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Animaltattle images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 138.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 138.0 kB or 54% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (59%)
32
13
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Animaltattle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
animaltattle.com
217 ms
animaltattle.com
523 ms
boise.js
30 ms
banger.js
57 ms
memphis.js
56 ms
minneapolis.js
55 ms
rochester.js
54 ms
css
82 ms
806a1af3699f7e09cc50a66a129c2b7b.css
63 ms
adsbygoogle.js
138 ms
lazyload.min.js
60 ms
8ab74d7a0a8af9956f726f542a331bba.js
60 ms
nmash.js
24 ms
anaheim.js
22 ms
imp.gif
100 ms
ga.js
196 ms
ezosuigeneris.js
417 ms
edmonton.webp
148 ms
jellyfish.webp
148 ms
animaltattle.com
364 ms
cropped-8f710b35-b973-48b8-b8c0-02fd9b670378_200x200-2.png
128 ms
Capture-min-1.png
130 ms
Capture-min.png
129 ms
chickens-eat-bananas-min.jpg
131 ms
chickens-eat-tomatoes-min.jpg
133 ms
Do-Rabbits-Blink-Their-Eyes.jpg
131 ms
can-rabbits-eat-lettuce_1b5dc162f4040248-min.jpg
362 ms
1579920892220.jpeg
131 ms
__utm.gif
57 ms
greenoaks.gif
38 ms
__utm.gif
36 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk30e4.woff
39 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFn8kEk30e4.woff
47 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkQl0k30e4.woff
90 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkpl0k30e4.woff
100 ms
6xKhdSpbNNCT-sWPCmg.woff
100 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
296 ms
greenoaks.gif
67 ms
__utm.gif
73 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
animaltattle.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
animaltattle.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
animaltattle.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Animaltattle.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Animaltattle.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
animaltattle.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Animaltattle. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: