2.5 sec in total
252 ms
2.1 sec
173 ms
Click here to check amazing Answerbag content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about answerbag.com
Ask questions on any topic, get real answers from real people. Have a question? Ask it. Know an answer? Share it.
Visit answerbag.comWe analyzed Answerbag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 252 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
answerbag.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value8.4 s
19/100
10%
Value2,630 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.337
33/100
15%
Value14.7 s
8/100
10%
252 ms
38 ms
7 ms
26 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Answerbag.com, 12% (7 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 12% (7 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (694 ms) belongs to the original domain Answerbag.com.
Page size can be reduced by 159.8 kB (20%)
788.5 kB
628.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Answerbag.com main page is 788.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 568.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.7 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Answerbag needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.3 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 71.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 71.9 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Answerbag.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 49% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (50%)
54
27
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Answerbag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
answerbag.com
252 ms
css
38 ms
jquery-ui.css
7 ms
bootstrap.min.css
26 ms
font-awesome.min.css
40 ms
main.css
79 ms
style.css
153 ms
responsive.css
155 ms
jquery.min.js
23 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
33 ms
bootstrap.min.js
23 ms
main.js
200 ms
api.js
61 ms
adsbygoogle.js
92 ms
analytics.js
163 ms
ab_banner170x71.png
622 ms
955ece3dabd49b2a27edae51a614fab9.jpg
624 ms
placeholder.png
271 ms
45c1d80f9059ac4ac216fdcaccc20cbf.jpg
623 ms
5a585055f6dc41346dd007d28adf37d4.jpg
624 ms
af99c1b1fad20bd27264717ed6b9bb59.png
620 ms
33a2cf2457022d4c0510db6ea33b41ba.jpg
625 ms
724c6dc6e65fc3e4f49b59e6260643e2.jpg
693 ms
b90c922bbd3ed368743986af38dae8e9.png
694 ms
ufonts.com_gotham_light-webfont.woff
265 ms
show_ads_impl.js
320 ms
gotham-bold-webfont.woff
162 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQbMZhKQ.woff
13 ms
collect
16 ms
84628273_176159830277856_972693363922829312_n.jpg
19 ms
collect
75 ms
js
102 ms
ga-audiences
23 ms
zrt_lookup.html
119 ms
ads
434 ms
ads
410 ms
ads
185 ms
data=r73nD2C6w7zeTTzxCgypPCbzimS1IFJzX4zjdQXUmG8vnkJAK8X24zzH2vWLCKHJ1zJqjUfqD2MRuF7XD9iRAzhKDaxmA66hDSSHO9cp3LwGO_l43LhgNlKz
258 ms
load_preloaded_resource.js
104 ms
abg_lite.js
102 ms
window_focus.js
240 ms
qs_click_protection.js
111 ms
ufs_web_display.js
67 ms
bbcd6bf18c20baa1b2adeb195de9b551.js
253 ms
icon.png
27 ms
reactive_library.js
244 ms
ca-pub-7761822059111346
308 ms
css
66 ms
4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpy8.woff
52 ms
4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpy8.woff
52 ms
sodar
201 ms
activeview
176 ms
ads
169 ms
WGg91BhL6Bhk3qTAPqmblqNZdzujbVjDoJfr3h8Q3EY.js
164 ms
10762545681834414833
154 ms
bbae3fd3506d8d9338f85d10ea9db8af.js
64 ms
fullscreen_api_adapter.js
49 ms
interstitial_ad_frame.js
55 ms
feedback_grey600_24dp.png
30 ms
settings_grey600_24dp.png
29 ms
answerbag.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
answerbag.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
answerbag.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Answerbag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Answerbag.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
answerbag.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Answerbag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: