4.9 sec in total
286 ms
4.2 sec
472 ms
Visit apemip.pt now to see the best up-to-date APEMIP content for Portugal and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about apemip.pt
A APEMIP é a associação profissional representativa dos Mediadores imobiliários de Portugal.
Visit apemip.ptWe analyzed Apemip.pt page load time and found that the first response time was 286 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
apemip.pt performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.0 s
1/100
10%
Value34.4 s
0/100
25%
Value19.2 s
0/100
10%
Value1,750 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.088
93/100
15%
Value21.9 s
1/100
10%
286 ms
567 ms
1091 ms
94 ms
186 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Apemip.pt, 12% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Apemip.pt.
Page size can be reduced by 720.2 kB (13%)
5.3 MB
4.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Apemip.pt main page is 5.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 186.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 186.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 468.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. APEMIP images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 54.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 54.6 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Apemip.pt has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (66%)
68
23
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of APEMIP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
apemip.pt
286 ms
apemip.pt
567 ms
www.apemip.pt
1091 ms
style-wpzoom-social-icons.css
94 ms
styles.css
186 ms
front.min.css
279 ms
style.css
279 ms
toolbar.css
286 ms
dashicons.min.css
377 ms
egoi-for-wp-public.css
286 ms
pagenavi-css.css
369 ms
dflip.min.css
372 ms
wpzoom-socicon.css
368 ms
genericons.css
369 ms
academicons.min.css
369 ms
font-awesome-3.min.css
452 ms
wpzoom-social-icons-styles.css
456 ms
mailin-front.css
458 ms
style.css
457 ms
egoi-for-wp-canvas.js
458 ms
jquery.min.js
552 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
544 ms
front.min.js
547 ms
mailin-front.js
548 ms
all.css
44 ms
index.js
547 ms
index.js
548 ms
scripts.js
634 ms
element.js
59 ms
8331778.js
107 ms
scripts.min.js
733 ms
dflip.min.js
923 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
652 ms
jquery.mobile.js
653 ms
social-icons-widget-frontend.js
652 ms
common.js
723 ms
api.js
54 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
744 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
746 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
745 ms
index.js
815 ms
style.css
374 ms
hotjar-1836675.js
236 ms
APEMIP_WhiteN_logo-1.png
189 ms
ConvencaoIMOCIONATE.gif
219 ms
PremiosExpressoImob_siteF1.png
188 ms
RevistaAPEMIP_Spring.jpg
586 ms
CicloFAPEMIP_Fullscreen_F.jpg
462 ms
API.jpg
839 ms
Associada.jpg
652 ms
Barometro_Site_F.jpg
656 ms
IMT.jpg
687 ms
fotolia-141541615-s-980x490.png
647 ms
business-3152586_1920-edited.jpg
770 ms
fundo-4-1046x706.png
833 ms
Banner_APEMIP_F.jpg
744 ms
cpci_h.png
748 ms
cpp_h.png
780 ms
SIL_Logo.png
836 ms
footer.logo_.uci_.gif
841 ms
APEMIP_WhiteN_logo-1-300x59.png
862 ms
analytics.js
159 ms
collectedforms.js
195 ms
banner.js
224 ms
conversations-embed.js
186 ms
8331778.js
191 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkCEv58i-xA.woff
127 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkCEv58i-xw.ttf
146 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkBgv58i-xA.woff
155 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkBgv58i-xw.ttf
169 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o58i-xA.woff
169 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o58i-xw.ttf
170 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58i-xA.woff
170 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58i-xw.ttf
166 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkKEo58i-xA.woff
169 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkKEo58i-xw.ttf
171 ms
modules.woff
739 ms
Genericons.woff
790 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
101 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
130 ms
flags.png
745 ms
Academia_slide.jpg
1024 ms
collect
20 ms
modules.404c8789d11e259a4872.js
21 ms
style.min.css
96 ms
apemip.pt accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
apemip.pt best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
apemip.pt SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
PT
![]()
PT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Apemip.pt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Portuguese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Apemip.pt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
apemip.pt
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of APEMIP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: