6.4 sec in total
206 ms
5.8 sec
386 ms
Click here to check amazing App Pack content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about app-pack.com
The domain name app-pack.com is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.
Visit app-pack.comWe analyzed App-pack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 206 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
app-pack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.5 s
2/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value13.3 s
2/100
10%
Value9,480 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.126
83/100
15%
Value18.4 s
3/100
10%
206 ms
3548 ms
173 ms
267 ms
278 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original App-pack.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Facebook.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain App-pack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 3.3 MB (77%)
4.3 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of App-pack.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 166.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 166.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, App Pack needs image optimization as it can save up to 27.4 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.7 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. App-pack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (83%)
82
14
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of App Pack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
app-pack.com
206 ms
app-pack.com
3548 ms
language-selector.css
173 ms
admin_icon.min.css
267 ms
styles.css
278 ms
go_pricing_styles.css
290 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
305 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
306 ms
css
59 ms
style.css
517 ms
font-awesome.css
355 ms
ilightbox.css
362 ms
animations.css
372 ms
font-awesome.min.css
403 ms
style.css
396 ms
popup.css
435 ms
font-awesome.min.css
24 ms
js_composer.css
571 ms
ultimate.min.css
673 ms
Defaults.css
484 ms
jquery.js
602 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
531 ms
jquery-ui.js
890 ms
ultimate.min.js
727 ms
adsbygoogle.js
40 ms
prettyPhoto.css
534 ms
owl.carousel.css
585 ms
owl.theme.default.css
641 ms
animate.css
640 ms
jquery.form.min.js
672 ms
scripts.js
690 ms
go_pricing_scripts.js
705 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
720 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
747 ms
comment-reply.min.js
752 ms
main.min.js
1000 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
788 ms
popup.min.js
807 ms
sitepress.js
880 ms
js_composer_front.js
881 ms
api.js
72 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
938 ms
owl.carousel.js
836 ms
core.min.js
36 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
758 ms
underscore.min.js
797 ms
waypoints.min.js
787 ms
vc_grid_style_all.js
774 ms
vc_grid_style_load_more.js
776 ms
vc_grid_style_lazy.js
723 ms
vc_grid_style_pagination.js
860 ms
vc_grid.js
851 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
822 ms
analytics.js
136 ms
hotjar-127447.js
548 ms
fbevents.js
134 ms
apppackerp.png
268 ms
en.png
268 ms
lv.png
268 ms
video-70x54.jpg
532 ms
Google-Partner-300x101.png
531 ms
GoDaddy_Logo-300x108.png
531 ms
Hostgator-300x142.png
531 ms
shopify-partner-300x68.png
531 ms
dreamhost-300x88.png
531 ms
DigitalOcean_logo-300x80.png
604 ms
sponsor-peer11-300x107.png
604 ms
jquery.min.js
513 ms
2Q-AW1e_taO6pHwMXcXW5w.ttf
432 ms
0ihfXUL2emPh0ROJezvraKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
432 ms
icomoon.woff
543 ms
Defaults.woff
709 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
14 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
592 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
593 ms
356 ms
collect
274 ms
366 ms
374 ms
413 ms
414 ms
ajax-loader.gif
204 ms
recaptcha__en.js
44 ms
collect
96 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
47 ms
anchor
58 ms
styles__ltr.css
50 ms
-FHGegChvKELgmHNPF97Aj33qC9PBXl7UyexHItfpAU.js
24 ms
webworker.js
37 ms
logo_48.png
34 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
21 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
32 ms
recaptcha__en.js
14 ms
320 ms
app-pack.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
app-pack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
app-pack.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
JA
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise App-pack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that App-pack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
app-pack.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of App Pack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: