3.8 sec in total
364 ms
2.2 sec
1.3 sec
Welcome to appfail.net homepage info - get ready to check Appfail best content right away, or after learning these important things about appfail.net
Cloud logging for .NET web applications using ELMAH. Find bugs before you go live. Powerful search, API, apps for Slack, Teams, GitHub & Visual Studio
Visit appfail.netWe analyzed Appfail.net page load time and found that the first response time was 364 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
appfail.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
88/100
10%
Value5.1 s
24/100
25%
Value1.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.071
96/100
15%
Value1.8 s
100/100
10%
364 ms
18 ms
435 ms
663 ms
566 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Appfail.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Consent.cookiebot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Elmah.io.
Page size can be reduced by 241.2 kB (31%)
783.3 kB
542.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Appfail.net main page is 783.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 391.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 121.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Appfail images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 87.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.2 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Appfail.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.7 kB or 26% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (10%)
49
44
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Appfail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
elmah.io
364 ms
style.min.css
18 ms
homepage.min.js
435 ms
gtm.js
663 ms
logo.png
566 ms
hero-bg.svg
561 ms
laptop-new-o.png
587 ms
error-logging-o.png
586 ms
wave.svg
608 ms
features-image-new.png
609 ms
features-step-1.png
606 ms
features-step-2.png
607 ms
features-step-3.png
606 ms
scott-hanselman.jpg
615 ms
sap.png
609 ms
equinor.png
616 ms
cogworks.png
611 ms
rosslyn-analytics.png
612 ms
nexwork.png
610 ms
oneil.png
664 ms
noordigital.png
667 ms
peloton.png
661 ms
hd2-o.png
666 ms
angela.png
662 ms
larsjacobsson.jpg
665 ms
quynhnguyen.jpg
669 ms
jamesreategui.jpg
668 ms
ismailmayat.jpg
667 ms
ian.png
670 ms
david.png
671 ms
garychapman.png
671 ms
logo.png
706 ms
sap.png
672 ms
equinor.png
673 ms
cogworks.png
674 ms
rosslyn-analytics.png
708 ms
book.png
708 ms
elmahio.png
710 ms
pcicompliant.png
546 ms
fa-duotone-900.woff
1117 ms
fa-light-300.woff
857 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
836 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
833 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
812 ms
gdpr.png
130 ms
shieldssl.png
131 ms
uptime-monitoring-o.png
130 ms
analytics.js
83 ms
uc.js
111 ms
collect
24 ms
configuration.js
66 ms
cc.js
111 ms
collect
63 ms
bc-v4.min.html
57 ms
ga-audiences
39 ms
appfail.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
appfail.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
appfail.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Appfail.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Appfail.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
appfail.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Appfail. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: