12.9 sec in total
329 ms
6.2 sec
6.4 sec
Visit applicant.com now to see the best up-to-date Applicant content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about applicant.com
Quality dot coms, quality LOGOS, quality PRICES
Visit applicant.comWe analyzed Applicant.com page load time and found that the first response time was 329 ms and then it took 12.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
applicant.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.787
5/100
15%
Value2.8 s
97/100
10%
329 ms
168 ms
97 ms
346 ms
343 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Applicant.com, 98% (64 requests) were made to Lovelogo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Lovelogo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 403.7 kB (20%)
2.0 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Applicant.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 239.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Applicant needs image optimization as it can save up to 239.9 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 95.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 95.7 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Applicant.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (6%)
63
59
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Applicant. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
applicant.com
329 ms
applicant
168 ms
main.css
97 ms
jquery.min.js
346 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
343 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
344 ms
pin_script.js
320 ms
script.js
756 ms
logo.png
448 ms
search.gif
386 ms
category.gif
386 ms
applicant.jpg
482 ms
protect.php
432 ms
phonepeek.jpg
783 ms
whatzy.jpg
438 ms
currencykings.jpg
434 ms
venueless.jpg
480 ms
CLIPSURFER.jpg
526 ms
kwwi.jpg
1059 ms
renovatedcondos.jpg
523 ms
pickter.jpg
596 ms
namerz.jpg
595 ms
smusher.jpg
557 ms
importy.jpg
1037 ms
guarantor.jpg
1073 ms
advertiseonit.jpg
1038 ms
geiu.jpg
878 ms
pescari.jpg
878 ms
cupzy.jpg
860 ms
defriending.jpg
877 ms
tased.jpg
859 ms
flanked.jpg
875 ms
clangy.jpg
941 ms
iqtoy.jpg
964 ms
stycker.jpg
964 ms
coupella.jpg
863 ms
doublepacks.jpg
931 ms
debta.jpg
929 ms
chesso.jpg
929 ms
phraso.jpg
928 ms
quadruply.jpg
925 ms
claspy.jpg
1006 ms
fontable.jpg
910 ms
floomy.jpg
910 ms
trialify.jpg
969 ms
qarrot.jpg
923 ms
APPTRACKERS.jpg
910 ms
folby.png
956 ms
kissograms.jpg
952 ms
flamely.jpg
911 ms
shirtable.jpg
909 ms
jockee.jpg
866 ms
rewindforward.jpg
864 ms
betpicker.jpg
981 ms
bedbuys.jpg
993 ms
wutta.jpg
612 ms
purfa.png
611 ms
fixerz.jpg
389 ms
APPAXE.jpg
388 ms
cakehq.jpg
388 ms
nujja.jpg
377 ms
rediance.jpg
346 ms
odebo.jpg
345 ms
loading.gif
330 ms
aAddToFavourite.php
251 ms
applicant.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
applicant.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
applicant.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Applicant.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Applicant.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
applicant.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Applicant. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: