6.5 sec in total
1.9 sec
4 sec
557 ms
Visit applicantstack.com now to see the best up-to-date Applicant Stack content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about applicantstack.com
ApplicantStack is the affordable, easy-to-use online applicant tracking system and employee onboarding system. Try it Free For 15 days.
Visit applicantstack.comWe analyzed Applicantstack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
applicantstack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value10.5 s
0/100
25%
Value14.1 s
1/100
10%
Value2,620 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.049
99/100
15%
Value20.4 s
2/100
10%
1946 ms
96 ms
98 ms
26 ms
110 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Applicantstack.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Applicantstack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (43%)
3.8 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Applicantstack.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 113.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 148.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Applicant Stack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 875.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 875.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 526.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Applicantstack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 526.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (67%)
48
16
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Applicant Stack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.applicantstack.com
1946 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
96 ms
layerslider.css
98 ms
css
26 ms
styles.css
110 ms
easy-author-image.css
109 ms
settings.css
255 ms
style.css
318 ms
font-awesome.css
224 ms
animations.css
206 ms
media.css
235 ms
default-styles.css
234 ms
greensock.js
402 ms
jquery.js
481 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
353 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
459 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
352 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
520 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
532 ms
css
13 ms
3233220679.js
201 ms
conversion_async.js
37 ms
anti-spam-3.5.js
394 ms
jquery.form.min.js
508 ms
scripts.js
508 ms
comment-reply.min.js
508 ms
modernizr-min.js
561 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-min.js
683 ms
jquery.cycle.js
674 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto-min.js
675 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
689 ms
jquery.fitvids-min.js
673 ms
main.js
927 ms
ga.js
48 ms
APH4jr0uSos5wiut5cpjronF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
33 ms
__utm.gif
20 ms
applicantstack-logo-tagline1.png
258 ms
blank.gif
181 ms
university_of_michigan_logo.png
261 ms
dominos-logo.png
296 ms
mcdonalds-logo.png
258 ms
hallmark-logo.png
368 ms
nothing-bundt-cakes-logo.png
520 ms
applicantstack-recruit-create-a-job.png
725 ms
collect
134 ms
applicant-tracking-system-homepage3.png
1255 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
463 ms
icomoon.woff
384 ms
skin.css
83 ms
skin.png
131 ms
applicant-tracking-system-homepage.jpg
553 ms
start-trial-button-applicantstack.png
107 ms
loading.gif
91 ms
applicantstack.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
applicantstack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
applicantstack.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Applicantstack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Applicantstack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
applicantstack.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Applicant Stack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: