Tools & Wizards About Us
appmechanic.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 5

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    57% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

appmechanic.in

Best in Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Standalone PC Software

Page Load Speed

10.4 sec in total

First Response

894 ms

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

3.5 sec

appmechanic.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to appmechanic.in homepage info - get ready to check Appmechanic best content right away, or after learning these important things about appmechanic.in

We provide a wide range of mobile apps and pc standalone software development services including Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality apps.

Visit appmechanic.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Appmechanic.in page load time and found that the first response time was 894 ms and then it took 9.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

appmechanic.in performance score

5

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,460 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.214

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.appmechanic.in

894 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

277 ms

bootstrap.min.css

460 ms

style.min.css

471 ms

style-wpzoom-social-icons.css

464 ms

Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Appmechanic.in, 12% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (9 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Appmechanic.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 154.4 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Appmechanic.in main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 946.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 87.4 kB

  • Original 106.9 kB
  • After minification 104.1 kB
  • After compression 19.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 30.2 kB

  • Original 946.5 kB
  • After minification 916.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Appmechanic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 31.2 kB

  • Original 144.5 kB
  • After minification 114.4 kB
  • After compression 113.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 31.2 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 163.4 kB
  • After minification 163.3 kB
  • After compression 157.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Appmechanic.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (86%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Appmechanic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.appmechanic.in

www.appmechanic.in

894 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

277 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

460 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

471 ms

style-wpzoom-social-icons.css

style-wpzoom-social-icons.css

464 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

467 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

511 ms

deprecated-style.min.css

deprecated-style.min.css

529 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

683 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

688 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

77 ms

public.css

public.css

695 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

696 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

773 ms

style.css

style.css

840 ms

style.css

style.css

909 ms

wpzoom-socicon.css

wpzoom-socicon.css

912 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

923 ms

academicons.min.css

academicons.min.css

903 ms

font-awesome-3.min.css

font-awesome-3.min.css

1027 ms

wpzoom-social-icons-styles.css

wpzoom-social-icons-styles.css

1054 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

1115 ms

frontend-legacy.min.css

frontend-legacy.min.css

1118 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

1135 ms

post-3141.css

post-3141.css

1132 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

1312 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

1295 ms

post-2604.css

post-2604.css

1341 ms

css

css

130 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1354 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1376 ms

js

js

149 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

1379 ms

widget.js

widget.js

127 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

1629 ms

wpforms-full.min.css

wpforms-full.min.css

1630 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

1629 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

1628 ms

functions.js

functions.js

1631 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1630 ms

api.js

api.js

131 ms

hero-slider.js

hero-slider.js

1922 ms

social-icons-widget-frontend.js

social-icons-widget-frontend.js

1685 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1489 ms

sp-scripts.js

sp-scripts.js

1410 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1404 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1472 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1580 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1573 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1491 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

1480 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

1500 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1499 ms

preloaded-modules.min.js

preloaded-modules.min.js

1547 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1477 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

1490 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1484 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

1518 ms

mailcheck.min.js

mailcheck.min.js

1520 ms

punycode.min.js

punycode.min.js

1497 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

1484 ms

wpforms.min.js

wpforms.min.js

1490 ms

Logo.png

Logo.png

1389 ms

App-Mechanic-AR-Image.png

App-Mechanic-AR-Image.png

2330 ms

App-Mechanic-AR2-Image.png

App-Mechanic-AR2-Image.png

2380 ms

Unity3DLogo.png

Unity3DLogo.png

1454 ms

UnrealEngineLogo2.png

UnrealEngineLogo2.png

1454 ms

ARButton.png

ARButton.png

1466 ms

VirtualReality1.png

VirtualReality1.png

1466 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

173 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

171 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

300 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

300 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

302 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

309 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

308 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1729 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1515 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

306 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

297 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

290 ms

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf

371 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

375 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf

374 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

15 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

139 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1689 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1689 ms

socicon.ttf

socicon.ttf

1833 ms

default

default

433 ms

collect

collect

126 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

268 ms

fallback

fallback

137 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

27 ms

css

css

18 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

16 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

63 ms

twk-entries-polyfill.js

twk-entries-polyfill.js

73 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

114 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

141 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

201 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

183 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

111 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

136 ms

Accessibility Review

appmechanic.in accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

appmechanic.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

appmechanic.in SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Appmechanic.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Appmechanic.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

appmechanic.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Appmechanic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: