2.6 sec in total
179 ms
1.8 sec
555 ms
Welcome to apppicker.com homepage info - get ready to check Apppicker best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about apppicker.com
iPhone and iPad applications. Find all apps and news about Apple on appPicker. Thousands of new and undiscovered iPad and iPhone app reviews.
Visit apppicker.comWe analyzed Apppicker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
apppicker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value300 ms
79/100
30%
Value0.159
73/100
15%
Value13.3 s
11/100
10%
179 ms
479 ms
214 ms
149 ms
154 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Apppicker.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Is1.mzstatic.com and 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (632 ms) belongs to the original domain Apppicker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 627.6 kB (28%)
2.2 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Apppicker.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 103.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 30.5 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.5 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Apppicker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 75.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 75.1 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 352.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Apppicker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 352.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (34%)
91
60
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Apppicker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
apppicker.com
179 ms
www.apppicker.com
479 ms
jquery.min.js
214 ms
jquery.yiiactiveform.js
149 ms
jquery.swipebox.min.js
154 ms
apppicker.vendor.min.css
154 ms
apppicker.min.css
255 ms
idangerous.swiper.css
199 ms
idangerous.swiper.scrollbar.css
238 ms
style.css
382 ms
custom.css
239 ms
profile-ui-calendar.css
299 ms
idangerous.swiper.min.js
287 ms
idangerous.swiper.scrollbar.js
302 ms
main.js
235 ms
apppicker.vendor.min.js
547 ms
modules.global.min.js
286 ms
apppicker.min.js
435 ms
common.js
305 ms
comments.js
308 ms
apppicker.js
435 ms
tracking.min.js
438 ms
css
67 ms
css
79 ms
css
90 ms
175x175-75.png
92 ms
175x175-75.png
90 ms
175x175-75.png
89 ms
175x175-75.png
166 ms
175x175-75.png
89 ms
175x175-75.png
81 ms
175x175-75.png
83 ms
175x175-75.png
84 ms
175x175-75.png
84 ms
logo.png
98 ms
6wvgcfzxpc.jpg
301 ms
extended-main-news-read-more-link.png
98 ms
ipk3mhccqr.jpg
153 ms
gpvrwgw84v.jpg
249 ms
zqsixaffbe.jpg
251 ms
bhzqlnwx8m.jpg
252 ms
uxvdkuxrbj.jpg
251 ms
3he38sijqk.jpg
352 ms
7bogrcwwra.jpg
349 ms
ved1gjtmum.jpg
291 ms
ow0z4bqxtl.jpg
385 ms
iqtgpe5h9n.jpg
382 ms
kema4tp1a4.jpg
355 ms
xnauemhqwu.jpg
398 ms
sprite-icons-arrow-next.png
425 ms
best-of-list-icon-1.png
436 ms
m7tdgit4lz.jpg
425 ms
9ujmndzjp0.jpg
457 ms
ufnpy6pt7p.jpg
458 ms
vvurb7xjih.jpg
495 ms
qkqr9tuyki.jpg
500 ms
gzxwwiubu3.jpg
493 ms
xunwc2hb48.jpg
518 ms
wx9wbqlxkp.jpg
532 ms
w9l0iutln9.jpg
533 ms
tk4kfnwhie.jpg
562 ms
nbwdlyp44u.png
593 ms
cwfozaa31q.jpg
573 ms
175x175-75.png
67 ms
175x175-75.png
77 ms
175x175-75.png
70 ms
175x175-75.png
72 ms
175x175-75.png
72 ms
175x175-75.png
66 ms
175x175-75.png
74 ms
175x175-75.png
67 ms
175x175-75.png
69 ms
175x175-75.png
73 ms
175x175-75.png
68 ms
175x175-75.png
72 ms
175x175-75.png
70 ms
175x175-75.png
72 ms
logo-gray.png
537 ms
4Z-2qkHrI1biwaOxvW6ZTA.woff
65 ms
Mef17w3J4CtS0lw4Wa_8rxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
80 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
147 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
162 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
162 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
162 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
162 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
601 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
612 ms
rockwell-mt-regular.ttf
632 ms
analytics.js
40 ms
watch.js
446 ms
atrk.js
33 ms
all.js
169 ms
atrk.gif
118 ms
collect
31 ms
test.png
327 ms
appoftheday
440 ms
110 ms
128 ms
xd_arbiter.php
122 ms
xd_arbiter.php
262 ms
advert.gif
85 ms
60x60bb.jpg
124 ms
1
85 ms
apppicker.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
apppicker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
apppicker.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Apppicker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Apppicker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
apppicker.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Apppicker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: