Tools & Wizards About Us
aptpackaging.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

aptpackaging.in

APT - Packaging Company

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

372 ms

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

954 ms

aptpackaging.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing APT Packaging content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about aptpackaging.in

APT - Packaging Company

Visit aptpackaging.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Aptpackaging.in page load time and found that the first response time was 372 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

aptpackaging.in performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value26.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,130 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.352

31/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aptpackaging.in

372 ms

css2

51 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

40 ms

font-awesome.min.css

48 ms

swiper-bundle.css

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (91 requests) were addressed to the original Aptpackaging.in, 7% (7 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Aptpackaging.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (35%)

Content Size

4.8 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Aptpackaging.in main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 110.5 kB

  • Original 124.6 kB
  • After minification 81.4 kB
  • After compression 14.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 43.3 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.5 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 244.4 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. APT Packaging images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 325.2 kB

  • Original 433.3 kB
  • After minification 411.6 kB
  • After compression 108.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 325.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 983.8 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 658.7 kB
  • After compression 104.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aptpackaging.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 983.8 kB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (24%)

Requests Now

100

After Optimization

76

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of APT Packaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

aptpackaging.in

aptpackaging.in

372 ms

css2

css2

51 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

40 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

48 ms

swiper-bundle.css

swiper-bundle.css

54 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

551 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

687 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

154 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

155 ms

style.css

style.css

530 ms

iso%20certified.svg

iso%20certified.svg

212 ms

quality%20management.svg

quality%20management.svg

225 ms

upgrading%20skill.svg

upgrading%20skill.svg

243 ms

home-about.jpg

home-about.jpg

286 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

378 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

395 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

298 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

482 ms

product1.jpg

product1.jpg

573 ms

product2.jpg

product2.jpg

581 ms

product3.jpg

product3.jpg

534 ms

product4.jpg

product4.jpg

547 ms

product9.jpg

product9.jpg

562 ms

product5.jpg

product5.jpg

608 ms

product6.jpg

product6.jpg

733 ms

product7.jpg

product7.jpg

734 ms

product8.jpg

product8.jpg

742 ms

innovation2.jpg

innovation2.jpg

734 ms

innovation1.jpg

innovation1.jpg

735 ms

inovation-mobile.png

inovation-mobile.png

770 ms

wcu-icon_2-1.svg

wcu-icon_2-1.svg

738 ms

wcu-icon_2-2.svg

wcu-icon_2-2.svg

740 ms

client-1.png

client-1.png

743 ms

client-2.png

client-2.png

749 ms

client-3.png

client-3.png

783 ms

client-4.png

client-4.png

783 ms

client-5.png

client-5.png

797 ms

client-6.png

client-6.png

802 ms

Brand.png

Brand.png

811 ms

Brand2.png

Brand2.png

833 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

16 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

12 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

18 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

882 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

768 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

793 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

736 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

722 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

723 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

704 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

659 ms

main.js

main.js

611 ms

Brand3.png

Brand3.png

784 ms

Brand4.png

Brand4.png

777 ms

Brand5.png

Brand5.png

777 ms

DIA1.jpg

DIA1.jpg

764 ms

DIA2.jpg

DIA2.jpg

724 ms

DIA3.jpg

DIA3.jpg

710 ms

DIA4.jpg

DIA4.jpg

697 ms

DIA5.jpg

DIA5.jpg

689 ms

DIA6.jpg

DIA6.jpg

680 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

652 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

527 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

526 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

526 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

526 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

527 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

521 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

520 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

520 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

11 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

612 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

3407 ms

fa-light-300.ttf

fa-light-300.ttf

628 ms

fa-thin-100.ttf

fa-thin-100.ttf

3373 ms

10.jpg

10.jpg

524 ms

11.jpg

11.jpg

505 ms

Reliable%20teamwork.svg

Reliable%20teamwork.svg

607 ms

Technological.svg

Technological.svg

597 ms

Timely%20delivery.svg

Timely%20delivery.svg

601 ms

Safe%20manufacturing.svg

Safe%20manufacturing.svg

618 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

598 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

596 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

635 ms

faq.jpg

faq.jpg

649 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

386 ms

banner2.jpg

banner2.jpg

388 ms

innovation3.jpg

innovation3.jpg

417 ms

innovation4.jpg

innovation4.jpg

440 ms

counters.jpg

counters.jpg

2892 ms

header.html

header.html

367 ms

footer.html

footer.html

2876 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

239 ms

api.js

api.js

240 ms

logo.png

logo.png

239 ms

insta.jpg

insta.jpg

126 ms

insta2.jpg

insta2.jpg

191 ms

insta3.jpg

insta3.jpg

285 ms

insta4.jpg

insta4.jpg

158 ms

insta5.jpg

insta5.jpg

144 ms

insta6.jpg

insta6.jpg

142 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

64 ms

fallback

fallback

27 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

7 ms

css

css

24 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

43 ms

Accessibility Review

aptpackaging.in accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

aptpackaging.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

aptpackaging.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ZX

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aptpackaging.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Aptpackaging.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

aptpackaging.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of APT Packaging. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: