Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

ar-racking.co.uk

Storage Solutions and Industrial Racking | AR Racking UK

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

314 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

628 ms

ar-racking.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ar-racking.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check AR Racking best content right away, or after learning these important things about ar-racking.co.uk

At AR Racking we design, manufacture and install storage systems for all types of loads for customers in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Visit ar-racking.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Ar-racking.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 314 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ar-racking.co.uk performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.1 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,670 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.8 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ar-racking.co.uk

314 ms

668 ms

gtm.js

66 ms

ae7f421e8e2f3bc7.css

106 ms

f90ad86030d3409a.css

210 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ar-racking.co.uk, 96% (46 requests) were made to Ar-racking.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (881 ms) relates to the external source Ar-racking.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 344.7 kB (42%)

Content Size

829.7 kB

After Optimization

485.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Ar-racking.co.uk main page is 829.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 454.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 226.3 kB

  • Original 265.3 kB
  • After minification 265.2 kB
  • After compression 39.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 226.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 32.8 kB

  • Original 454.1 kB
  • After minification 421.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. AR Racking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 85.6 kB

  • Original 110.4 kB
  • After minification 110.4 kB
  • After compression 24.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (93%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of AR Racking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ar-racking.co.uk accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a valid value for its [lang] attribute.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ar-racking.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ar-racking.co.uk SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    GB

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ar-racking.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ar-racking.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: