2.7 sec in total
175 ms
2 sec
595 ms
Welcome to architectural-review.com homepage info - get ready to check Architectural Review best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about architectural-review.com
The Architectural Review is the only global architecture magazine for the 21st century. Be inspired and provoked by incisive critiques and the thinking behind the buildings shaping architectural disco...
Visit architectural-review.comWe analyzed Architectural-review.com page load time and found that the first response time was 175 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
architectural-review.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.1 s
0/100
10%
Value11.9 s
0/100
25%
Value14.9 s
1/100
10%
Value6,020 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value29.0 s
0/100
10%
175 ms
277 ms
360 ms
290 ms
13 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Architectural-review.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net and 5% (3 requests) were made to Aka-cdn-ns.adtech.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Aka-cdn-ns.adtech.de.
Page size can be reduced by 763.6 kB (34%)
2.2 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Architectural-review.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 138.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.0 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Architectural Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 323.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 323.2 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 219.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Architectural-review.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 219.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (32%)
50
34
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Architectural Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
architectural-review.com
175 ms
www.architectural-review.com
277 ms
dtagent624_xnr23_1057.js
360 ms
fonts.css
290 ms
7FE325CF2E22014DB9515B014EBEC17C.css
13 ms
modernizr.js
7 ms
1004925672.js
209 ms
DAC.js
467 ms
w1192214.js
1034 ms
4275348ED65E9299C6EFFA14146839CA.js
17 ms
02A507F7AFE5D7837.css
8 ms
event
45 ms
ScotchMicro.woff
21 ms
gtm.js
67 ms
print.css
8 ms
logo.svg
17 ms
logo-desktop.svg
13 ms
print_logo.png
18 ms
ar-ma-ind.jpg
20 ms
ar-ma-mmi.jpg
20 ms
3010575_Indexforeditorial.jpg
37 ms
3010718_Fayland-house-your-views-small.jpg
35 ms
3010432_1233139_Volume_One_Number_One.jpg
36 ms
1334228_hrh_index.jpg
42 ms
3010447_tumblr_lk6t0xdLy41qzss4xo1_500.jpg
37 ms
1276674_160-161.jpg
35 ms
3006710_JV_Wall_Fire_Station_Gloucester.jpg
38 ms
3006604_Lorenzo_Castro_Argos_Centre_3.jpg
39 ms
3006587_Schmidt_Hammer_Lassen_ICC_2.jpg
36 ms
3006710_JV_Wall_Fire_Station_Gloucester.jpg
41 ms
3006377_AR-Work-Awards-Index.jpg
39 ms
3003461_AR-Work-Soundcloud.jpg
39 ms
3009017_201602.jpg
67 ms
AR-footerimgcropped3-60.jpg
66 ms
ar-logo-2611.png
66 ms
sprite.css-b06c53e3.svg
35 ms
w8j5g
28 ms
sprite.main.svg
23 ms
list.bullet.png
100 ms
list.style1.svg
100 ms
postscribe.js
304 ms
script.js
41 ms
dc.js
41 ms
fbevents.js
95 ms
ScotchModern.woff
15 ms
runtime.2.2.4.js
31 ms
3010575_Indexforeditorial.jpg
23 ms
1334228_hrh_index.jpg
24 ms
3010447_tumblr_lk6t0xdLy41qzss4xo1_500.jpg
23 ms
3006710_JV_Wall_Fire_Station_Gloucester.jpg
78 ms
AR-footerimgcropped3-60.jpg
23 ms
submit
49 ms
__utm.gif
19 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
__utm.gif
107 ms
__utm.gif
115 ms
129 ms
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
2 ms
architectural-review.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
architectural-review.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
architectural-review.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Architectural-review.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Architectural-review.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
architectural-review.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Architectural Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: