Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

ardigraf.net

Félicitations ! Votre domaine a bien été créé chez OVHcloud !

Page Load Speed

7.2 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

302 ms

ardigraf.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ardigraf content for Italy. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ardigraf.net

OVHcloud accompagne votre évolution grâce au meilleur des infrastructures web : hébergement, nom de domaine, serveur dédié, CDN, Cloud, Big Data, ...

Visit ardigraf.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Ardigraf.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ardigraf.net performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

92/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.071

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ardigraf.net

1545 ms

reset.css

179 ms

defaults.css

181 ms

style.css

183 ms

bootstrap.css

186 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Ardigraf.net, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Ricettariotipico.it.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 631.7 kB (17%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Ardigraf.net main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 70.8 kB

  • Original 84.2 kB
  • After minification 67.7 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.6 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 23.7 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ardigraf images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 398.8 kB

  • Original 532.8 kB
  • After minification 413.0 kB
  • After compression 134.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 398.8 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 138.5 kB

  • Original 165.5 kB
  • After minification 128.4 kB
  • After compression 27.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ardigraf.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 138.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (56%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

33

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ardigraf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ardigraf.net accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

ardigraf.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ardigraf.net SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    IT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ardigraf.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Italian language. Our system also found out that Ardigraf.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ardigraf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: