Tools & Wizards About Us
arizonaprocessservers.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

arizonaprocessservers.org

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

121 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

172 ms

arizonaprocessservers.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Arizonaprocessservers content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about arizonaprocessservers.org

The Arizona Process Servers Association (APSA), is a non-profit organization that represents the interests of professional process servers in Arizona.

Visit arizonaprocessservers.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Arizonaprocessservers.org page load time and found that the first response time was 121 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

arizonaprocessservers.org performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

arizonaprocessservers.org

121 ms

arizonaprocessservers.org

188 ms

css

41 ms

bootstrap.min.css

133 ms

style_v2.css

247 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Arizonaprocessservers.org, 7% (4 requests) were made to D2i2wahzwrm1n5.cloudfront.net and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (484 ms) belongs to the original domain Arizonaprocessservers.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (52%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Arizonaprocessservers.org main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 33.6 kB

  • Original 40.0 kB
  • After minification 29.6 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.4 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 31.5 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Arizonaprocessservers images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 979.1 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 324.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 979.1 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 855.4 kB

  • Original 985.0 kB
  • After minification 779.1 kB
  • After compression 129.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Arizonaprocessservers.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 855.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (86%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Arizonaprocessservers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

arizonaprocessservers.org

arizonaprocessservers.org

121 ms

arizonaprocessservers.org

arizonaprocessservers.org

188 ms

css

css

41 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

133 ms

style_v2.css

style_v2.css

247 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

174 ms

streamline-icon.css

streamline-icon.css

208 ms

header.css

header.css

213 ms

portfolio.css

portfolio.css

143 ms

blog.css

blog.css

167 ms

v-animation.css

v-animation.css

179 ms

v-bg-stylish.css

v-bg-stylish.css

200 ms

font-icons.css

font-icons.css

242 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

282 ms

utilities.css

utilities.css

234 ms

theme-responsive.css

theme-responsive.css

241 ms

aos.css

aos.css

255 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

267 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

274 ms

toastr.min.css

toastr.min.css

274 ms

settings.css

settings.css

275 ms

default.css

default.css

278 ms

custom_v2.css

custom_v2.css

299 ms

MicrosoftAjax.js

MicrosoftAjax.js

341 ms

Core.js

Core.js

30 ms

jQuery.js

jQuery.js

34 ms

jQueryInclude.js

jQueryInclude.js

33 ms

toastr.min.js

toastr.min.js

311 ms

Ajax.js

Ajax.js

35 ms

popper.js

popper.js

286 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

287 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

287 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

306 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

313 ms

jquery.carouFredSel.min.js

jquery.carouFredSel.min.js

369 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

369 ms

theme-plugins.js

theme-plugins.js

371 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

370 ms

imagesloaded.js

imagesloaded.js

370 ms

view.min.js

view.min.js

369 ms

aos.js

aos.js

370 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

438 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

484 ms

theme-core.js

theme-core.js

374 ms

theme.js

theme.js

371 ms

theme.init.js

theme.init.js

347 ms

logo-apsa.png

logo-apsa.png

202 ms

az3b.jpg

az3b.jpg

203 ms

az4b.jpg

az4b.jpg

235 ms

az6b.jpg

az6b.jpg

204 ms

logo-apsa-white-2022.png

logo-apsa-white-2022.png

204 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

95 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

96 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

139 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

140 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

37 ms

Museo500-Regular-webfont.woff

Museo500-Regular-webfont.woff

37 ms

revicons90c6.woff

revicons90c6.woff

35 ms

Accessibility Review

arizonaprocessservers.org accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Best Practices

arizonaprocessservers.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

arizonaprocessservers.org SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arizonaprocessservers.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Arizonaprocessservers.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

arizonaprocessservers.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Arizonaprocessservers. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: