3.5 sec in total
128 ms
2.8 sec
549 ms
Visit armstaffing.com now to see the best up-to-date ARMStaffing content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about armstaffing.com
Start your journey today with ARMS. 1000s of travel nurse contracts across the country - RNs, LPNs, and CNAs - Local, Travel and Per Diem.
Visit armstaffing.comWe analyzed Armstaffing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 128 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
armstaffing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value8.1 s
20/100
10%
Value2,050 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.285
42/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
128 ms
803 ms
65 ms
127 ms
313 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Armstaffing.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Armstaffing.sensehq.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (803 ms) belongs to the original domain Armstaffing.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (49%)
2.3 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Armstaffing.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 944.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 159.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 159.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ARMStaffing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 531.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 531.5 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 438.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Armstaffing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 438.4 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (69%)
51
16
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ARMStaffing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
armstaffing.com
128 ms
www.armstaffing.com
803 ms
styles.css
65 ms
magnific_popup.css
127 ms
animate.css
313 ms
job-listings.css
197 ms
dnd-upload-cf7.css
192 ms
style.min.css
460 ms
job-board-prod.css
197 ms
style.css
193 ms
snippet.js
354 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
252 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
251 ms
index.js
257 ms
index.js
262 ms
jquery.min.js
434 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
318 ms
codedropz-uploader-min.js
324 ms
dnd-upload-cf7.js
329 ms
custom_app.js
365 ms
scripts.min.js
678 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
391 ms
easypiechart.js
428 ms
salvattore.js
444 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
454 ms
common.js
512 ms
api.js
38 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
511 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
511 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
632 ms
index.js
519 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
690 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
578 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
574 ms
gtm.js
66 ms
2_ARMS_logo_color.png
103 ms
app_2.png
218 ms
nurseim.jpg
338 ms
ipadimage.jpg
223 ms
tim-mossholder-3I3WVoA-Gks-unsplash-400x250.jpg
217 ms
gaberielpic-400x250.jpg
264 ms
lisette-400x250.jpg
273 ms
app-store.jpg
285 ms
google-play-button.jpg
286 ms
joint-commission-seal.png
292 ms
5_ARMS_short_horizontal_white.png
326 ms
social_icons-fb.png
335 ms
social_icons-insta.png
349 ms
social_icons-indeed.png
348 ms
et-divi-dynamic-7-late.css
325 ms
modules.woff
451 ms
fbevents.js
108 ms
recaptcha__en.js
92 ms
style.min.css
204 ms
armstaffing.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
armstaffing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
armstaffing.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Armstaffing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Armstaffing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
armstaffing.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ARMStaffing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: