Tools & Wizards About Us
armstronginlay.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

armstronginlay.com

One moment, please...

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

1.9 sec

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

138 ms

armstronginlay.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Armstronginlay content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about armstronginlay.com

A fully equipped woodworking shop with custom veneering and inlay banding, Armstrong Inlay are able to manufacture any piece of furniture for the home or office including custom built-in architectural...

Visit armstronginlay.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Armstronginlay.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

armstronginlay.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

armstronginlay.com

1892 ms

buttons.js

96 ms

IEstyle.css

180 ms

AIlogo.gif

95 ms

button27.gif

173 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Armstronginlay.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Armstronginlay.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 7.8 kB (68%)

Content Size

11.4 kB

After Optimization

3.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Armstronginlay.com main page is 11.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 10.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 10.5 kB
  • After minification 10.1 kB
  • After compression 2.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 318 B
  • After minification 318 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Armstronginlay images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 82 B

  • Original 318 B
  • After minification 318 B
  • After compression 236 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 82 B or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 92 B

  • Original 318 B
  • After minification 309 B
  • After compression 226 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Armstronginlay.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 92 B or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (77%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Armstronginlay. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

armstronginlay.com

armstronginlay.com

1892 ms

buttons.js

buttons.js

96 ms

IEstyle.css

IEstyle.css

180 ms

AIlogo.gif

AIlogo.gif

95 ms

button27.gif

button27.gif

173 ms

button2A.gif

button2A.gif

174 ms

button2D.gif

button2D.gif

179 ms

button3B.gif

button3B.gif

184 ms

button33.gif

button33.gif

190 ms

button44.gif

button44.gif

188 ms

button6A.gif

button6A.gif

266 ms

maple_diamond_quilt.jpg

maple_diamond_quilt.jpg

183 ms

button28.gif

button28.gif

96 ms

button2C.gif

button2C.gif

92 ms

button2B.gif

button2B.gif

91 ms

button2F.gif

button2F.gif

96 ms

button2E.gif

button2E.gif

94 ms

button3D.gif

button3D.gif

91 ms

button3C.gif

button3C.gif

179 ms

button34.gif

button34.gif

181 ms

button46.gif

button46.gif

183 ms

button45.gif

button45.gif

187 ms

button6B.gif

button6B.gif

189 ms

Accessibility Review

armstronginlay.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

armstronginlay.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

armstronginlay.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Armstronginlay.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Armstronginlay.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

armstronginlay.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Armstronginlay. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: