Tools & Wizards About Us
arnita.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 1

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    19% of other websites

  • 58

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 25% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

arnita.in

Arnita Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | Architects in Mumbai | SEZ Consultant Mumbai | India

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

279 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

561 ms

arnita.in screenshot

About Website

Visit arnita.in now to see the best up-to-date Arnita content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about arnita.in

Arnita Consultants offer Architectural and Engineering Design services to various Industries like Pharmaceuticals, Bio technology, Labs, R & D, Residential, Logistics, etc.

Visit arnita.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Arnita.in page load time and found that the first response time was 279 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

arnita.in performance score

1

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value26.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,590 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.924

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

arnita.in

279 ms

css

27 ms

css

33 ms

bootstrap.min.css

198 ms

font-awesome.min.css

103 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Arnita.in, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (925 ms) belongs to the original domain Arnita.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (32%)

Content Size

5.1 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Arnita.in main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 108.1 kB

  • Original 117.7 kB
  • After minification 110.4 kB
  • After compression 9.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.1 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 501.3 kB

  • Original 3.7 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Arnita needs image optimization as it can save up to 501.3 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 605.3 kB

  • Original 858.6 kB
  • After minification 814.4 kB
  • After compression 253.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 605.3 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 394.9 kB

  • Original 465.3 kB
  • After minification 415.7 kB
  • After compression 70.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Arnita.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 394.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (43%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

43

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Arnita. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

arnita.in

arnita.in

279 ms

css

css

27 ms

css

css

33 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

198 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

103 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

105 ms

style.css

style.css

76 ms

extralayers.css

extralayers.css

107 ms

settings.css

settings.css

232 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

141 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

167 ms

cubeportfolio.min.css

cubeportfolio.min.css

274 ms

jquery.mmenu.css

jquery.mmenu.css

168 ms

style.css

style.css

302 ms

nav-css.css

nav-css.css

241 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

jquery-latest.min.js

17 ms

nav-script.js

nav-script.js

276 ms

style.css

style.css

288 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

416 ms

jssor.slider.min.js

jssor.slider.min.js

385 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

465 ms

wowslider.js

wowslider.js

324 ms

script.js

script.js

367 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

545 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

546 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

552 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

549 ms

jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js

jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js

548 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

546 ms

moderniz.js

moderniz.js

552 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

549 ms

jquery.mmenu.min.js

jquery.mmenu.min.js

711 ms

js

js

59 ms

app.js

app.js

714 ms

css

css

37 ms

css

css

68 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

264 ms

arrow_down.png

arrow_down.png

249 ms

image1.jpg

image1.jpg

266 ms

image2.jpg

image2.jpg

295 ms

image3.jpg

image3.jpg

383 ms

image4.jpg

image4.jpg

381 ms

image5.jpg

image5.jpg

762 ms

image6.jpg

image6.jpg

764 ms

image7.jpg

image7.jpg

771 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

774 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

779 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

777 ms

client_1.png

client_1.png

763 ms

client_2.png

client_2.png

764 ms

client_3.png

client_3.png

774 ms

client_4.png

client_4.png

771 ms

client_5.png

client_5.png

774 ms

client_6.png

client_6.png

779 ms

client_7.png

client_7.png

777 ms

client_8.png

client_8.png

779 ms

client_9.png

client_9.png

788 ms

client_10.png

client_10.png

788 ms

client_11.png

client_11.png

789 ms

client_12.png

client_12.png

791 ms

client_13.png

client_13.png

791 ms

client_14.png

client_14.png

719 ms

client_15.png

client_15.png

720 ms

client_16.png

client_16.png

718 ms

client_18.png

client_18.png

718 ms

client_19.png

client_19.png

717 ms

client_20.png

client_20.png

925 ms

client_21.png

client_21.png

716 ms

client_22.png

client_22.png

921 ms

client_23.png

client_23.png

764 ms

client_24.png

client_24.png

771 ms

client_25.png

client_25.png

763 ms

map.jpg

map.jpg

787 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

780 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

785 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff

19 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

21 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff

27 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff

25 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

751 ms

bg2.jpg

bg2.jpg

668 ms

footer-bg.jpg

footer-bg.jpg

365 ms

gen_204

gen_204

176 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

117 ms

timer.png

timer.png

120 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

377 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

358 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

377 ms

revicons.ttf

revicons.ttf

71 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

88 ms

Accessibility Review

arnita.in accessibility score

58

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

arnita.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

arnita.in SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arnita.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Arnita.in main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

arnita.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Arnita. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: