2.4 sec in total
109 ms
2.1 sec
214 ms
Visit arrayguard.com now to see the best up-to-date Array Guard content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about arrayguard.com
Array's Secure Application Delivery architecture helps enterprises avoid the pitfalls of static, piece-meal application deployment including cost, complexity, safety and under-performance.
Visit arrayguard.comWe analyzed Arrayguard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 109 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
arrayguard.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value4.6 s
71/100
10%
Value1,790 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value22.9 s
1/100
10%
109 ms
300 ms
58 ms
46 ms
175 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Arrayguard.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (653 ms) belongs to the original domain Arrayguard.com.
Page size can be reduced by 63.4 kB (7%)
956.0 kB
892.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Arrayguard.com main page is 956.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 518.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Array Guard images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 18.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 17.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Arrayguard.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.3 kB or 51% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (66%)
61
21
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Array Guard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
arrayguard.com
109 ms
arrayguard.com
300 ms
css
58 ms
bootstrap.min.css
46 ms
all.css
175 ms
js
97 ms
api.js
59 ms
jquery.min.js
39 ms
bootstrap.min.js
57 ms
custom.js
139 ms
poststyle.css
168 ms
styles.css
194 ms
styles.css
37 ms
js
110 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
gtm.js
105 ms
recaptcha__en.js
49 ms
trustlogo.js
457 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
197 ms
ga-audiences
47 ms
collect
47 ms
qevents.js
80 ms
pixel
56 ms
pixel.js
66 ms
insight.min.js
77 ms
uwt.js
53 ms
collect
26 ms
js
50 ms
ga-audiences
24 ms
adsct
241 ms
adsct
149 ms
rp.gif
67 ms
gtm.js
71 ms
arrayguard-logo-new.png
69 ms
TruckGrey_xsm.png
124 ms
array-logo.gif
124 ms
banner-top.jpg
632 ms
GL-APV5800-sm.png
472 ms
GL-AG1100-sm.png
499 ms
AVX7800-sm.png
498 ms
AMP-sm.png
499 ms
ResponseCodes-sm.jpg
498 ms
cloud.jpg
499 ms
Free-Shipping-Banner.png
653 ms
mastercard-visa-amex-discover.png
533 ms
li_sync
204 ms
fbevents.js
202 ms
2317774.js
265 ms
WidgetScript
202 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
189 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
248 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf
280 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
148 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
264 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
435 ms
js
175 ms
collect
129 ms
stat.js
303 ms
widget
610 ms
adsct
295 ms
adsct
284 ms
1585037994854611
38 ms
conversations-embed.js
223 ms
leadflows.js
280 ms
fb.js
222 ms
2317774.js
236 ms
2317774.js
242 ms
web-interactives-embed.js
279 ms
1039805853290840
41 ms
arrayguard.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
arrayguard.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
arrayguard.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arrayguard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Arrayguard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
arrayguard.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Array Guard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: