Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

arsenika.ink

Home | ARSENIKA

Page Load Speed

501 ms in total

First Response

90 ms

Resources Loaded

351 ms

Page Rendered

60 ms

arsenika.ink screenshot

About Website

Welcome to arsenika.ink homepage info - get ready to check ARSENIKA best content for New Zealand right away, or after learning these important things about arsenika.ink

ARSENIKA: A magazine of speculative flash fiction and poetry.

Visit arsenika.ink

Key Findings

We analyzed Arsenika.ink page load time and found that the first response time was 90 ms and then it took 411 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

arsenika.ink performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

85/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

arsenika.ink

90 ms

arsenika.ink

94 ms

arsenika.css

41 ms

android-skiplink-fix.js

68 ms

arsenika-250x44.png

64 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Arsenika.ink, 14% (1 request) were made to Swetrix.org and 14% (1 request) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (102 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.jsdelivr.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 12.4 kB (48%)

Content Size

25.8 kB

After Optimization

13.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Arsenika.ink main page is 25.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 14.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 9.8 kB

  • Original 14.5 kB
  • After minification 13.4 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.8 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 8.2 kB
  • After minification 6.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, ARSENIKA needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 275 B
  • After minification 275 B
  • After compression 263 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 615 B

  • Original 2.8 kB
  • After minification 2.8 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Arsenika.ink needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 615 B or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ARSENIKA. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

arsenika.ink accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

arsenika.ink best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

arsenika.ink SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arsenika.ink can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Arsenika.ink main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ARSENIKA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: