Tools & Wizards About Us
artceiling.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

artceiling.ru

Установка натяжных потолков в Москве и МО под ключ | ARTceiling.ru

Page Load Speed

23.5 sec in total

First Response

574 ms

Resources Loaded

22.4 sec

Page Rendered

511 ms

artceiling.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to artceiling.ru homepage info - get ready to check ARTceiling best content right away, or after learning these important things about artceiling.ru

Монтаж натяжных потолков и освещения в Москве и Подмосковье под ключ. Расчитать стоимость натяжного потолка. Бесплатный выезд замерщика. Звоните +79257400708

Visit artceiling.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Artceiling.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 574 ms and then it took 22.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

artceiling.ru performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value12.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,610 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

artceiling.ru

574 ms

artceiling.su

856 ms

style1.css

160 ms

modernizr-2.6.1.min.js

307 ms

jquery.min.js

84 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Artceiling.ru, 80% (32 requests) were made to Artceiling.su and 5% (2 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.1 sec) relates to the external source Informer.yandex.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 97.9 kB (22%)

Content Size

438.3 kB

After Optimization

340.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Artceiling.ru main page is 438.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 366.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 22.3 kB

  • Original 31.4 kB
  • After minification 27.4 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.0 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.3 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 51.5 kB

  • Original 366.2 kB
  • After minification 314.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, ARTceiling needs image optimization as it can save up to 51.5 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 26.2 kB
  • After minification 24.5 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 14.5 kB
  • After minification 12.5 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Artceiling.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 54% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (17%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ARTceiling. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

artceiling.ru

artceiling.ru

574 ms

artceiling.su

artceiling.su

856 ms

style1.css

style1.css

160 ms

modernizr-2.6.1.min.js

modernizr-2.6.1.min.js

307 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

84 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

206 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

390 ms

main.js

main.js

391 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

64 ms

share42.js

share42.js

418 ms

jquery.countdown.js

jquery.countdown.js

415 ms

cycounter

cycounter

346 ms

3_1_FFE6CCFF_FFE6CCFF_0_pageviews

3_1_FFE6CCFF_FFE6CCFF_0_pageviews

242 ms

shapka3-1.png

shapka3-1.png

180 ms

shapka3.png

shapka3.png

526 ms

img0019.png

img0019.png

686 ms

02-art.png

02-art.png

185 ms

shema.jpg

shema.jpg

344 ms

calk2.gif

calk2.gif

183 ms

p-01svet.jpg

p-01svet.jpg

508 ms

001_06.gif

001_06.gif

347 ms

arrowstop.gif

arrowstop.gif

347 ms

ballons.jpg

ballons.jpg

511 ms

garantiya.png

garantiya.png

690 ms

irina.jpg

irina.jpg

519 ms

sergey.jpg

sergey.jpg

682 ms

Ilya.jpg

Ilya.jpg

683 ms

marina.jpg

marina.jpg

706 ms

lackfolie.gif

lackfolie.gif

696 ms

renolit_logo_1.jpg

renolit_logo_1.jpg

824 ms

clipso.gif

clipso.gif

815 ms

pongd-sml.jpg

pongd-sml.jpg

831 ms

alkor.jpg

alkor.jpg

846 ms

polyplast-sml.png

polyplast-sml.png

852 ms

ctn-sml.jpg

ctn-sml.jpg

864 ms

watch.js

watch.js

1 ms

input-name.png

input-name.png

927 ms

input-tel.png

input-tel.png

934 ms

3_1_FFE6CCFF_FFE6CCFF_0_pageviews

3_1_FFE6CCFF_FFE6CCFF_0_pageviews

20061 ms

icons.png

icons.png

293 ms

Accessibility Review

artceiling.ru accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

artceiling.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

artceiling.ru SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Artceiling.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Artceiling.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

artceiling.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ARTceiling. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: