11.9 sec in total
1.7 sec
7.6 sec
2.5 sec
Welcome to artebel.com homepage info - get ready to check Artebel best content right away, or after learning these important things about artebel.com
The sponge applicator of the lens cleaner VEPLUS allows an easy cleaning of eyeglasses or spectacles and touchscreens as it avoids fluid splashes.
Visit artebel.comWe analyzed Artebel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 10.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
artebel.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.8 s
1/100
10%
Value13.5 s
0/100
25%
Value12.6 s
3/100
10%
Value620 ms
48/100
30%
Value0.822
4/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
1749 ms
431 ms
327 ms
426 ms
518 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Artebel.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Artebel.com.
Page size can be reduced by 118.8 kB (6%)
2.1 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Artebel.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 74.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Artebel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (66%)
87
30
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Artebel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
1749 ms
analytics.js
431 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
327 ms
style.min.css
426 ms
estilos.css
518 ms
settings.css
512 ms
pagenavi-css.css
522 ms
reset.css
521 ms
normalize.css
518 ms
1140.css
523 ms
font-awesome.min.css
621 ms
gnmenu.css
614 ms
main.css
730 ms
prettyPhoto.css
625 ms
flexslider.css
633 ms
layout.css
642 ms
color.css
720 ms
style-custom.css
735 ms
noscript.css
737 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
743 ms
js_composer.min.css
918 ms
Defaults.css
825 ms
style.min.css
894 ms
animate.min.css
896 ms
advanced-buttons.min.css
870 ms
css
304 ms
jquery.js
1053 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1052 ms
principal.js
1150 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1190 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1187 ms
modernizr.js
1185 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
1187 ms
custom.min.js
1187 ms
jquery-appear.min.js
1298 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1532 ms
background-style.min.css
1515 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1529 ms
jquery.easing.js
1556 ms
collect
51 ms
jquery.color.js
1398 ms
collect
43 ms
appear.js
1306 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
1222 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1226 ms
jquery.countTo.js
1220 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.js
1234 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
1228 ms
superfish.js
1230 ms
supersubs.js
1140 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
1131 ms
gnmenu.js
1124 ms
retina.min.js
1123 ms
custom.js
1112 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
1036 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
1025 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
1021 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1022 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1016 ms
ultimate_bg.min.js
927 ms
hotjar-1777794.js
506 ms
button_login.png
280 ms
1464 ms
logo-veplus-1.png
278 ms
Antivaho-y-Limpiador-Veplus_slider-inicio_22.11.2021.png
1846 ms
slider_movil_ingles_15.09.2020.png
671 ms
gif_aplicador_limpiador_08.09.2020.gif
498 ms
Veplus-Antifog_logo.png
493 ms
frasco-antivaho-125x580.png
497 ms
frasco-antivaho-175x700.png
664 ms
Veplus-lens-cleaner_logo-1.png
576 ms
frasco-limpiador-160x700.png
1454 ms
frasco-limpiador-135x580.png
1422 ms
frasco_veplus_peque%C3%B1o.png
1422 ms
frasco_hoyaplus.png
1418 ms
frasco_confortdefinity2.png
1450 ms
frasco_multiopticas.png
1424 ms
frasco_zasvision.png
1441 ms
frasco_soloptica.png
1421 ms
personalizar_frascos-movil.png
1436 ms
made.in-spain-1.png
1433 ms
chica-oficina-llamar-alguien-telefono_1301-2679-1-626x375.jpg
1431 ms
chica-oficina-llamar-alguien-telefono_1301-2679-1.jpg
1440 ms
es.png
1421 ms
gb.png
1414 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
315 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1327 ms
modules.2be88a2123e5e486752f.js
129 ms
revolution.extension.video.min.js
452 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
446 ms
artebel.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
artebel.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
artebel.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Artebel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Artebel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
artebel.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Artebel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: