4 sec in total
68 ms
3.6 sec
344 ms
Visit artificialowl.net now to see the best up-to-date Artificial Owl content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about artificialowl.net
The most fascinating abandoned man-made creations
Visit artificialowl.netWe analyzed Artificialowl.net page load time and found that the first response time was 68 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
artificialowl.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
75/100
10%
Value2.8 s
84/100
25%
Value3.2 s
91/100
10%
Value1,500 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value8.2 s
40/100
10%
68 ms
126 ms
38 ms
7 ms
57 ms
Our browser made a total of 128 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Artificialowl.net, 38% (48 requests) were made to Blogger.googleusercontent.com and 8% (10 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source Blogger.googleusercontent.com.
Page size can be reduced by 599.6 kB (13%)
4.4 MB
3.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Artificialowl.net main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 95.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 45.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Artificial Owl images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 459.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 459.2 kB or 41% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 77 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Artificialowl.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (34%)
99
65
The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Artificial Owl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
artificialowl.net
68 ms
www.artificialowl.net
126 ms
55013136-widget_css_bundle.css
38 ms
feed.css
7 ms
platform.js
57 ms
show_ads.js
117 ms
show_afs_search.js
31 ms
en_US
17 ms
51 ms
4290687098-widgets.js
50 ms
square-header2.png
16 ms
15 ms
2.JPG
412 ms
artificialowl
85 ms
3.JPG
355 ms
4.JPG
410 ms
5.JPG
422 ms
IMG_6247.JPG
296 ms
IMG_6244.JPG
359 ms
IMG_6239.JPG
626 ms
IMG_6232.JPG
653 ms
IMG_6225.JPG
816 ms
IMG_6220.JPG
684 ms
IMG_6216.JPG
865 ms
IMG_6213.JPG
851 ms
IMG_6188.JPG
1012 ms
IMG_6180.JPG
1058 ms
IMG_6272.JPG
999 ms
IMG_6271.JPG
1317 ms
IMG_6262.JPG
1316 ms
IMG_6189.JPG
1316 ms
P5170146.jpg
1487 ms
2404538997_03eac96423_b.jpg
1343 ms
P5160108.jpg
1345 ms
3507201665_c62a02537c_o.jpg
2032 ms
3478966784_fc0ff26ca2_o.jpg
1809 ms
3478166623_5649a68f38_b.jpg
1592 ms
3478154951_f60e0aea59_b.jpg
1594 ms
3369326371_0056d1aed6_o(2).jpg
1742 ms
344600891_ac5e8d1d30_o.jpg
1966 ms
16+broken+door+DSCF1912.JPG
1966 ms
3369811554_b4953ce2a5_o(2).jpg
1967 ms
P5170143.jpg
2070 ms
26+stairs+DSCF1872.JPG
2432 ms
22+home+DSCF1901.JPG
2290 ms
IMG_3918.jpg
2360 ms
halftrackrelic.jpg
2277 ms
IMG_3935.jpg
2381 ms
M3_Halftrack.jpg
2366 ms
20 ms
19 ms
19 ms
20 ms
20 ms
19 ms
authorization.css
72 ms
blogger.js
141 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
10 ms
google_top_exp.js
8 ms
artificialowl.json
138 ms
navbar.g
89 ms
adsbygoogle.js
127 ms
branding.css
10 ms
authorization.css
22 ms
branding.css
24 ms
cm
37 ms
cm
36 ms
cm
33 ms
cm
29 ms
cm
27 ms
cm
27 ms
cm
25 ms
icons_gray.png
31 ms
platform:gapi.iframes.style.common.js
18 ms
arrows-black.png
28 ms
artificialowl
102 ms
186 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
5 ms
show_ads_impl.js
290 ms
1267679.jpg
2428 ms
297178672_22c09dd6b8_o.jpg
2344 ms
ga.js
10 ms
PJ011746.jpg
2272 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
map2.jpg
2356 ms
map1.jpg
2375 ms
collect
26 ms
IMG_4954.jpg
2468 ms
zrt_lookup.html
30 ms
ads
45 ms
ads
428 ms
IMG_4960.jpg
2361 ms
ads
101 ms
ads
81 ms
cacoastlineorg.jpg
2432 ms
ads
84 ms
ads
367 ms
ads
299 ms
IMG_4956.jpg
2361 ms
IMG_4959.jpg
2448 ms
IMG_4957.jpg
2282 ms
devslide1.jpg
2408 ms
16176274566643626865
237 ms
icon.png
12 ms
abg_lite.js
48 ms
s
11 ms
window_focus.js
235 ms
cookie_push_onload.html
21 ms
qs_click_protection.js
53 ms
ufs_web_display.js
38 ms
one_click_handler_one_afma.js
271 ms
17192202017390234719
278 ms
i.match
433 ms
sn.ashx
311 ms
generic
290 ms
usersync.aspx
269 ms
activeview
84 ms
activeview
144 ms
pixel
22 ms
pixel
16 ms
pixel
18 ms
WGg91BhL6Bhk3qTAPqmblqNZdzujbVjDoJfr3h8Q3EY.js
3 ms
i.match
190 ms
pixel
78 ms
pixel
15 ms
spacer.gif
144 ms
13464135-lightbox_bundle.css
6 ms
1666805145-lbx.js
9 ms
artificialowl.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
artificialowl.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
artificialowl.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Artificialowl.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Artificialowl.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
artificialowl.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Artificial Owl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: