Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

arur.de

Reiserücktritt & Reisestorno – Was zahlt die Versicherung? Auch bei einer Pandemie? - Welcher-Reisekoffer.de

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

376 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

arur.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Arur content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about arur.de

Dann Corona ist eine Urlaubsplanung praktisch nicht  möglich. Welche Versicherung zahlt bei Reiserücktritt und Reisestorno?

Visit arur.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Arur.de page load time and found that the first response time was 376 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

arur.de performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

60/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

60/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.068

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

arur.de

376 ms

732 ms

1f909118a741a8fa6ca0d0b11b79e4e2.css

343 ms

jquery.min.js

631 ms

lazyload.min.js

623 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Arur.de, 91% (20 requests) were made to Welcher-reisekoffer.de and 5% (1 request) were made to Secure.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (828 ms) relates to the external source Welcher-reisekoffer.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 193.5 kB (77%)

Content Size

251.2 kB

After Optimization

57.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Arur.de main page is 251.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 230.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 192.8 kB

  • Original 230.6 kB
  • After minification 175.1 kB
  • After compression 37.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 55.5 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 192.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 653 B

  • Original 20.6 kB
  • After minification 19.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Arur images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Arur. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

arur.de accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

arur.de best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

arur.de SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arur.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Arur.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Arur. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: