Tools & Wizards About Us
ascension.solutions screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

ascension.solutions

Ascension Solutions

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

428 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

635 ms

ascension.solutions screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ascension content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ascension.solutions

Visit ascension.solutions

Key Findings

We analyzed Ascension.solutions page load time and found that the first response time was 428 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ascension.solutions performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.9 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ascension.solutions

428 ms

styles.css

121 ms

css

21 ms

bootstrap.min.css

188 ms

flaticon.css

126 ms

Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Ascension.solutions, 23% (23 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (575 ms) belongs to the original domain Ascension.solutions.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 234.8 kB (26%)

Content Size

901.8 kB

After Optimization

667.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ascension.solutions main page is 901.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 370.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 112.8 kB

  • Original 137.2 kB
  • After minification 133.8 kB
  • After compression 24.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 11.4 kB

  • Original 226.6 kB
  • After minification 215.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ascension images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 54.5 kB

  • Original 370.6 kB
  • After minification 370.6 kB
  • After compression 316.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 54.5 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 56.1 kB

  • Original 167.4 kB
  • After minification 167.4 kB
  • After compression 111.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ascension.solutions needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 56.1 kB or 34% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (74%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ascension. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ascension.solutions

ascension.solutions

428 ms

styles.css

styles.css

121 ms

css

css

21 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

188 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

126 ms

nivo-slider.min.css

nivo-slider.min.css

127 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

126 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

128 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

183 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

191 ms

default.css

default.css

192 ms

elementor.css

elementor.css

259 ms

rtanimation.css

rtanimation.css

192 ms

style.css

style.css

247 ms

jquery.timepicker.min.css

jquery.timepicker.min.css

255 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

255 ms

custom-frontend.min.css

custom-frontend.min.css

256 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

271 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

310 ms

post-2504.css

post-2504.css

310 ms

widget-spacer.min.css

widget-spacer.min.css

311 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

311 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

313 ms

post-128.css

post-128.css

313 ms

css

css

31 ms

css

css

17 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

320 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

328 ms

css

css

24 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

429 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

317 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

370 ms

index.js

index.js

370 ms

index.js

index.js

428 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

430 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

551 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

430 ms

popper.js

popper.js

472 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

476 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

544 ms

jquery.navpoints.js

jquery.navpoints.js

541 ms

jquery.countdown.min.js

jquery.countdown.min.js

485 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

482 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.min.js

jquery.nivo.slider.min.js

480 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js

541 ms

jquery.timepicker.min.js

jquery.timepicker.min.js

539 ms

tilt.jquery.js

tilt.jquery.js

487 ms

jquery.parallax-scroll.js

jquery.parallax-scroll.js

479 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

480 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

478 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

536 ms

main.js

main.js

478 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

475 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

475 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

464 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

462 ms

ascension.solutions

ascension.solutions

398 ms

logo-e1669012428861.png

logo-e1669012428861.png

396 ms

logo-light.png

logo-light.png

398 ms

element58.png

element58.png

398 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

399 ms

element21.png

element21.png

400 ms

element22.png

element22.png

459 ms

element29.png

element29.png

461 ms

element30.png

element30.png

458 ms

element31.png

element31.png

430 ms

about2.jpg

about2.jpg

554 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

106 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

59 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

108 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

102 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

174 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

104 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

201 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

202 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

104 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

202 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

104 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

200 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

102 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

103 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

104 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

106 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

105 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

574 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

435 ms

feature4.png

feature4.png

431 ms

feature5.png

feature5.png

444 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

504 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

130 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

128 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

132 ms

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf

131 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

132 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf

132 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

453 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

575 ms

home-15-slider-img.png

home-15-slider-img.png

383 ms

svg2.svg

svg2.svg

444 ms

footer2_bg.png

footer2_bg.png

329 ms

Accessibility Review

ascension.solutions accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ascension.solutions best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ascension.solutions SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ascension.solutions can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ascension.solutions main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ascension.solutions

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ascension. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: