2.1 sec in total
818 ms
1.1 sec
174 ms
Click here to check amazing Asmp content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about asmp.org
ASMP is built to help you succeed! Build & Grow Your Visual Content Creation Business Today with the Resources Only Available at ASMP.
Visit asmp.orgWe analyzed Asmp.org page load time and found that the first response time was 818 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
asmp.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.9 s
1/100
10%
Value17.5 s
0/100
25%
Value15.5 s
0/100
10%
Value16,670 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value34.7 s
0/100
10%
818 ms
23 ms
25 ms
26 ms
28 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Asmp.org, 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (818 ms) belongs to the original domain Asmp.org.
Page size can be reduced by 579.6 kB (55%)
1.1 MB
473.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Asmp.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 659.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 68.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Asmp needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.5 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 415.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 415.3 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 64.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Asmp.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 64.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (69%)
72
22
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Asmp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
asmp.org
818 ms
book.css
23 ms
extlink.css
25 ms
filefield.css
26 ms
nice_menus.css
28 ms
asmp_menus.css
29 ms
node.css
34 ms
defaults.css
37 ms
system.css
65 ms
system-menus.css
58 ms
user.css
67 ms
content-module.css
67 ms
date.css
67 ms
datepicker.css
70 ms
timeentry.css
75 ms
domain_nav.css
72 ms
calendar.css
72 ms
farbtastic.css
73 ms
fieldgroup.css
75 ms
context-reset.css
78 ms
base.css
80 ms
style.css
89 ms
dots_shadow.css
78 ms
colorbox.css
82 ms
sifr.css
88 ms
jquery.js
98 ms
drupal.js
92 ms
extlink.js
91 ms
nice_menus.js
92 ms
preload.js
105 ms
rollovers.js
106 ms
viewport.js
107 ms
hoverIntent.js
106 ms
styledselect.js
107 ms
common.js
107 ms
sifr.js
105 ms
sifr-config.js
93 ms
sifr-replacements.js
93 ms
addthis_widget.js
68 ms
gpt.js
137 ms
ga.js
137 ms
analytics.js
137 ms
300lo.json
21 ms
asmp_logo.jpg
36 ms
find_photog.jpg
38 ms
join_asmp.jpg
38 ms
login.jpg
37 ms
quick_links.jpg
68 ms
menu_bg.jpg
68 ms
menu_spacer.jpg
69 ms
search_go.jpg
70 ms
Stacked_tagline.jpg
70 ms
dpBestflow_Button.png
69 ms
Apr11_4.jpg
72 ms
home_notice_events_mask.png
70 ms
dots_shadow-home-notice-right.png
70 ms
dots_shadow-home-notice-bottom.png
71 ms
home_notice_news_mask.png
72 ms
home_notice_feature_mask.png
72 ms
findphotog_icon.png
73 ms
releases_icon.png
74 ms
bulletin_icon.png
74 ms
linkedin_icon2.png
74 ms
facebook_icon2.png
75 ms
twitter_icon2.png
73 ms
share_icon2.png
74 ms
asmp_logo_hover.jpg
107 ms
select_arrow.jpg
74 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
29 ms
pubads_impl_81.js
38 ms
__utm.gif
24 ms
collect
46 ms
container.html
20 ms
asmp.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
asmp.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
asmp.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Asmp.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Asmp.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
asmp.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Asmp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: