5.2 sec in total
732 ms
3.9 sec
562 ms
Welcome to astechprocessing.com homepage info - get ready to check Astech Processing best content for Jordan right away, or after learning these important things about astechprocessing.com
Visit astechprocessing.comWe analyzed Astechprocessing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 732 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
astechprocessing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value13.2 s
2/100
10%
Value650 ms
45/100
30%
Value0.288
42/100
15%
Value10.1 s
26/100
10%
732 ms
1329 ms
357 ms
269 ms
39 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Astechprocessing.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Astechprocessing.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (77%)
2.6 MB
600.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Astechprocessing.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 72.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Astech Processing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 775.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 775.7 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Astechprocessing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (84%)
56
9
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Astech Processing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
astechprocessing.com
732 ms
www.astechprocessing.com
1329 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
357 ms
layerslider.css
269 ms
css
39 ms
Defaults.css
359 ms
styles.css
207 ms
go_pricing_styles.css
365 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
253 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
468 ms
tp_twitter_plugin.css
258 ms
settings.css
345 ms
js_composer.css
543 ms
css
47 ms
main.min.css
812 ms
font-awesome.min.css
446 ms
fontello.css
473 ms
main-ec4581655c.css
524 ms
custom-572f84f8d3.css
891 ms
media-28cc7b9a59.css
645 ms
style.css
564 ms
greensock.js
527 ms
jquery.js
529 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
531 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
532 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
538 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
637 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
721 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
565 ms
headings.css
504 ms
animate.css
485 ms
style.css
487 ms
tooltip.css
488 ms
css
76 ms
btn-min.css
490 ms
css
86 ms
jquery.form.min.js
490 ms
scripts.js
583 ms
go_pricing_scripts.js
590 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
675 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
663 ms
main.js
1353 ms
wp-embed.min.js
592 ms
js_composer_front.js
576 ms
headings.js
568 ms
jquery.appear.js
485 ms
custom.js
479 ms
tooltip.js
477 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
13 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
13 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
23 ms
white_wall_hash.gif
12 ms
analytics.js
13 ms
blank.gif
22 ms
sh.png
22 ms
collect
38 ms
fontello.woff
398 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
27 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
51 ms
Defaults.svg
365 ms
Defaults.woff
395 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
160 ms
skin.css
84 ms
logo21.png
25 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
4 ms
astechprocessing.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
astechprocessing.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Astechprocessing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Astechprocessing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
astechprocessing.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Astech Processing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: