8.2 sec in total
842 ms
5.1 sec
2.3 sec
Visit astrographic.com now to see the best up-to-date Astrographic content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about astrographic.com
Astrographic Ind. is working with a multitude of customers ranging from large government sectors to small local businesses. We are leading provider of custom signage for your home & business. Create y...
Visit astrographic.comWe analyzed Astrographic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 842 ms and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
astrographic.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.2 s
0/100
10%
Value14.9 s
0/100
25%
Value16.3 s
0/100
10%
Value10,890 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value28.4 s
0/100
10%
842 ms
139 ms
129 ms
37 ms
172 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Astrographic.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Assets.juicer.io and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (842 ms) belongs to the original domain Astrographic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 219.2 kB (4%)
6.0 MB
5.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Astrographic.com main page is 6.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Astrographic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 99.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.2 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Astrographic.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (74%)
53
14
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Astrographic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.astrographic.com
842 ms
js
139 ms
embed.css
129 ms
style.min.css
37 ms
wc-blocks-vendors-style.css
172 ms
wc-blocks-style.css
274 ms
style.min.css
253 ms
style.min.css
243 ms
style.min.css
227 ms
style.min.css
228 ms
style.min.css
227 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
275 ms
woocommerce.css
277 ms
style.c68f1b70.css
344 ms
jquery.min.js
366 ms
embed-no-jquery.js
193 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
339 ms
219847.js
227 ms
classic-10_7.css
225 ms
mc-validate.js
281 ms
wpdevart_lightbox_front.css
342 ms
effects_lightbox.css
338 ms
index.js
340 ms
index.js
500 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
675 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
675 ms
js.cookie.min.js
677 ms
woocommerce.min.js
676 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
677 ms
select2.full.min.js
677 ms
svgxuse.min.js
677 ms
velocity.min.js
678 ms
am2-functions.min.6c0648d7.js
679 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
680 ms
wpdevart_lightbox_front.js
678 ms
embed.js
279 ms
analytics.js
92 ms
collect
353 ms
hotjar-2039784.js
306 ms
sprite.svg
196 ms
hero-image.jpg
212 ms
site-bg.png
212 ms
5P9A0814-scaled.jpg
212 ms
5P9A0735-e1521500822553.jpg
198 ms
lees-market.jpg
310 ms
polara.jpg
453 ms
Aleo-Regular.woff
103 ms
Aleo-Light.woff
104 ms
Aleo-Bold.woff
103 ms
Arimo-Bold.woff
105 ms
Arimo.woff
267 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
117 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
190 ms
modules.61e17720cf639c3e96a7.js
195 ms
slick.min.js
172 ms
astrographics-3.png
123 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
21 ms
ztaj65g8bhf8gboaldp1io16baw3ukkk.js
130 ms
case_study_city_of_leduc_hero_image-scaled.jpg
62 ms
SCREEN-GRAB-3-e1521501880729.jpg
50 ms
render.d26cfa992228f00f13af.js
29 ms
astrographic.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
astrographic.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
astrographic.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Astrographic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Astrographic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
astrographic.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Astrographic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: