Tools & Wizards About Us
astrojem.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

astrojem.net

The Universe and the Human is a matter of great interest

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

964 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

114 ms

astrojem.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to astrojem.net homepage info - get ready to check Astrojem best content right away, or after learning these important things about astrojem.net

The Universe and the human. It is interesting that we know about the universe in which we live for a very brief flash of time.

Visit astrojem.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Astrojem.net page load time and found that the first response time was 964 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

astrojem.net performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.8 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,380 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.087

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.7 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.astrojem.net

964 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

215 ms

style.min.css

336 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

327 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

436 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Astrojem.net, 20% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Revenueflex.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (964 ms) belongs to the original domain Astrojem.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 763.8 kB (69%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

335.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Astrojem.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 579.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 51.3 kB

  • Original 64.0 kB
  • After minification 51.0 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.0 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 100.0 kB
  • After minification 100.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Astrojem images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 413.7 kB

  • Original 579.6 kB
  • After minification 561.1 kB
  • After compression 165.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 413.7 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 298.7 kB

  • Original 355.9 kB
  • After minification 327.5 kB
  • After compression 57.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Astrojem.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 298.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (91%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Astrojem. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.astrojem.net

www.astrojem.net

964 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

215 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

336 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

cookie-law-info-public.css

327 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

436 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

543 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

686 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

350 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

436 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

453 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

467 ms

style.css

style.css

651 ms

css

css

38 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

764 ms

cookie-law-info-public.js

cookie-law-info-public.js

570 ms

js

js

72 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

61 ms

prebid.js

prebid.js

144 ms

5eeb64162285585436265f75399293a8896e5393.js

5eeb64162285585436265f75399293a8896e5393.js

156 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

493 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

561 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

600 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

610 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

666 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

670 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js

746 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

833 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

747 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

831 ms

script.js

script.js

831 ms

wp-slimstat.min.js

wp-slimstat.min.js

28 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

831 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

832 ms

1997

1997

149 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

19 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

58 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

70 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

82 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

86 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

98 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYw.woff

99 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYw.woff

98 ms

ionicons.ttf

ionicons.ttf

123 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzQ.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzQ.woff

96 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsI.woff

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsI.woff

96 ms

3d-space-scene-scaled-e1609950909140-1536x513.jpg

3d-space-scene-scaled-e1609950909140-1536x513.jpg

247 ms

Accessibility Review

astrojem.net accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

astrojem.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

astrojem.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Astrojem.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Spanish language. Our system also found out that Astrojem.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

astrojem.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Astrojem. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: