Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

auzangatetrekking.com

▷ AUSANGATE TREK | Trekking in Peru, Treks to Machu Picchu

Page Load Speed

11.9 sec in total

First Response

189 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

8.2 sec

auzangatetrekking.com screenshot

About Website

Visit auzangatetrekking.com now to see the best up-to-date Auzangate Trekking content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about auzangatetrekking.com

Ausangate Trekking Peru Company is the unique company that is 100% specialists just in Ausangate Trek and Rainbow Mountain Peru.

Visit auzangatetrekking.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Auzangatetrekking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 189 ms and then it took 11.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

auzangatetrekking.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.auzangatetrekking.com

189 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

45 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

88 ms

pagenavi-css.css

94 ms

style.css

94 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Auzangatetrekking.com, 34% (32 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (905 ms) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 229.6 kB (1%)

Content Size

18.5 MB

After Optimization

18.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Auzangatetrekking.com main page is 18.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 18.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 192.0 kB

  • Original 223.9 kB
  • After minification 155.3 kB
  • After compression 31.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 68.6 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 192.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 37.5 kB

  • Original 18.3 MB
  • After minification 18.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Auzangate Trekking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 69 B

  • Original 20.0 kB
  • After minification 20.0 kB
  • After compression 19.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (16%)

Requests Now

85

After Optimization

71

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Auzangate Trekking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

auzangatetrekking.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

auzangatetrekking.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

auzangatetrekking.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Auzangatetrekking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Auzangatetrekking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Auzangate Trekking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: