2 sec in total
109 ms
935 ms
955 ms
Click here to check amazing AWE 2017 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about awe2017.com
Join over 5,000 AR & VR professionals at the 8th annual AWE in Santa Clara, California on May 31 - June 2, 2017.
Visit awe2017.comWe analyzed Awe2017.com page load time and found that the first response time was 109 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
awe2017.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value40.1 s
0/100
25%
Value11.5 s
5/100
10%
Value2,730 ms
3/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value41.3 s
0/100
10%
109 ms
37 ms
166 ms
120 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Awe2017.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (792 ms) belongs to the original domain Awe2017.com.
Page size can be reduced by 4.6 MB (43%)
10.7 MB
6.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Awe2017.com main page is 10.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.2 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.6 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, AWE 2017 needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.6 MB or 39% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 33.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.3 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 837.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Awe2017.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 837.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (23%)
47
36
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of AWE 2017. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
awe2017.com
109 ms
css
37 ms
style-f7b4398e348fd721fc8375943af55eae.css
166 ms
trade20e7.css
120 ms
css
59 ms
custom.css
102 ms
jar7y2fv2amexqutq1w1.png
70 ms
jar7y2fv2amexqutq1w1.png
76 ms
bizzabo-loader.gif
58 ms
vg2bshd5iu5fgfw7qhk6.png
313 ms
i02jk51ybdgcfterptqu.png
88 ms
bral34qhmg9itcrrdgxr.png
208 ms
reonjbmznh20m6xtstrg.jpg
206 ms
ywpnkijaonxwmkc3iry7.jpg
209 ms
zrndafoig5kddp5ws4nc.jpg
198 ms
p0cCSr6SjSj2QFqLLuQT_Inspire-TEE.png
204 ms
MoQbFT0QfmFe8UeT3p1R_Design-TEE2.png
206 ms
QXR1CoTaR5aQRNwcsuAW_Develop-TEE.png
211 ms
4OPxgZXwSfe68fp2pEFU_Work-TEE-2.png
209 ms
2qQSSNIVSHe27SAwVEgt_Life-TEE.png
311 ms
oZif7uoCSamSnyiAdNK7_Startup-TEE.png
309 ms
awe2017.com
309 ms
AVR0WmWRSyKerIIqEYil_5Grid-TEE.png
740 ms
rbf0nonmqjcitsbo6y4u.png
350 ms
lbdjfklswilt03q6lllj.jpg
357 ms
rl6q53yibimbnhr3uqjc.jpg
741 ms
fmuc73qi04lahx7acdeq.jpg
356 ms
586544-a901bc83a8b6cf1b44e046d7b7fea7cd.html
78 ms
jquery-3.4.1.min.js
43 ms
bootstrap.min.js
51 ms
bqq7vlyrz6bkry5ihto1.png
519 ms
kknxbxvtd0xytddvsjxh.jpg
519 ms
myvg8saj9rsaorjjom9u.jpg
721 ms
c1hfol5xreivub0xqh94.jpg
721 ms
dwhwc44s84o3887qfeos.jpg
720 ms
dzcrxkxkxu7in00cdbwx.jpg
719 ms
o1mbeh7gi84fkg052hix.jpg
792 ms
lb523watfvrjxacykjax.jpg
792 ms
DamMMCI25Ws
149 ms
videoseries
252 ms
www-player.css
10 ms
www-embed-player.js
110 ms
base.js
166 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
61 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
237 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
437 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
439 ms
bizzafont-3185a62de562f46ac19e4d753f76e121.woff
438 ms
ad_status.js
325 ms
qYKp54bxMdgPywYfc-yhqguRPCT31YTVhLYxMebccTE.js
215 ms
embed.js
85 ms
LkuKemzoOqYdtlgiw7DYJ45brvry8QuaZG5CCzBl3aCzjx8kp1xiaK_ED_Muo4e3MWAJ5GeU0w=s68-c-k-c0x00ffffff-no-rj
102 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
14 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
14 ms
id
27 ms
awe2017.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
awe2017.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
awe2017.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Awe2017.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Awe2017.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
awe2017.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of AWE 2017. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: