Tools & Wizards About Us
awesomewave.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

awesomewave.net

Awesome Wave | Romantic Travel, Wellness, Culture, and Luxury

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

252 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

438 ms

awesomewave.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to awesomewave.net homepage info - get ready to check Awesome Wave best content right away, or after learning these important things about awesomewave.net

A romantic travel blog covering romance, wellness, culture, and luxury, by UK travel bloggers Raj and Elizabeth.

Visit awesomewave.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Awesomewave.net page load time and found that the first response time was 252 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

awesomewave.net performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.239

52/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

69/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

awesomewave.net

252 ms

awesomewave.net

430 ms

js

89 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

86 ms

style.min.css

244 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Awesomewave.net, 12% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (508 ms) belongs to the original domain Awesomewave.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 181.4 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Awesomewave.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 136.1 kB

  • Original 160.9 kB
  • After minification 159.3 kB
  • After compression 24.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 136.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 10.1 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 996.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Awesome Wave images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 13.3 kB

  • Original 145.6 kB
  • After minification 145.6 kB
  • After compression 132.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 22.0 kB

  • Original 88.6 kB
  • After minification 88.6 kB
  • After compression 66.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Awesomewave.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (62%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Awesome Wave. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

awesomewave.net

awesomewave.net

252 ms

awesomewave.net

awesomewave.net

430 ms

js

js

89 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

86 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

244 ms

css

css

50 ms

widget.css

widget.css

239 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

238 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

317 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

239 ms

login-with-ajax.js

login-with-ajax.js

240 ms

ajaxify.min.js

ajaxify.min.js

314 ms

js

js

46 ms

gsap.min.js

gsap.min.js

411 ms

ScrollTrigger.min.js

ScrollTrigger.min.js

315 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

409 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

408 ms

menu-aim.min.js

menu-aim.min.js

410 ms

functions.min.js

functions.min.js

475 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

40 ms

Awesome-Wave-Logo-1.png

Awesome-Wave-Logo-1.png

125 ms

Awesome-Wave.png

Awesome-Wave.png

169 ms

wellness.jpg

wellness.jpg

239 ms

culture-travel.jpg

culture-travel.jpg

508 ms

Dubai-Expo-2020.jpg

Dubai-Expo-2020.jpg

437 ms

u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZJ.ttf

u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZJ.ttf

82 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

83 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

95 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

97 ms

tipi.ttf

tipi.ttf

96 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

97 ms

collect

collect

39 ms

in.php

in.php

102 ms

Accessibility Review

awesomewave.net accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

awesomewave.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

awesomewave.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Awesomewave.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Awesomewave.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

awesomewave.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Awesome Wave. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: