2.1 sec in total
277 ms
1.5 sec
352 ms
Welcome to mirror.app.link homepage info - get ready to check Mirror App best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about mirror.app.link
Read reviews, compare customer ratings, see screenshots, and learn more about Mirror: Emoji & Avatar Maker. Download Mirror: Emoji & Avatar Maker and enjoy it on your iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch.
Visit mirror.app.linkWe analyzed Mirror.app.link page load time and found that the first response time was 277 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
mirror.app.link performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
78/100
10%
Value3.1 s
75/100
25%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
277 ms
188 ms
218 ms
15 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Mirror.app.link, 41% (19 requests) were made to Apps.apple.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Js-cdn.music.apple.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (277 ms) relates to the external source Apps.apple.com.
Page size can be reduced by 3.8 MB (78%)
4.8 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Mirror.app.link main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 507.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 507.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.4 MB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 841.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mirror.app.link needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 841.5 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (53%)
19
9
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mirror App. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
id1199126741
277 ms
fonts
188 ms
globalheader.css
218 ms
ac-global-footer.4a7162bbfb49c42f9ba734511824ad69.css
15 ms
musickit.js
101 ms
musickit-components.esm.js
103 ms
musickit-components.js
107 ms
web-experience-app-real-d41d14cf89036086c4f1b0aa9d19dc48.css
15 ms
vendor-cf4054121297881820edb5690edfbd70.js
14 ms
chunk.526.14ff28008c804d4cc489.js
12 ms
chunk.143.2f38c4af77e99d28e8ae.js
12 ms
web-experience-app-b4ad835c0f3e5cbe2269eba4351aa85a.js
23 ms
web-experience-app-7480a6b9154352d81a429d85f1a923ca.modern.js
23 ms
1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif
14 ms
stars-lg-bc4f4bfdd931e007ab096dd1c209c689.svg
121 ms
five-star-rating-gray-ec0707c56bc834adf5dd504c555d4982.svg
60 ms
sf-pro-display_semibold.woff
75 ms
sf-pro-display_bold.woff
129 ms
sf-pro-display_heavy.woff
129 ms
sf-pro-display_black.woff
119 ms
sf-pro-display_medium.woff
71 ms
sf-pro-display_regular.woff
73 ms
sf-pro-display_light.woff
121 ms
sf-pro-display_thin.woff
73 ms
sf-pro-display_ultralight.woff
127 ms
sf-pro-text_regular.woff
121 ms
sf-pro-text_medium.woff
121 ms
sf-pro-text_light.woff
122 ms
sf-pro-text_thin.woff
122 ms
sf-pro-text_ultralight.woff
123 ms
sf-pro-text_semibold.woff
124 ms
sf-pro-text_bold.woff
122 ms
sf-pro-text_heavy.woff
124 ms
sf-pro-text_black.woff
123 ms
SFProIcons_semibold.woff
127 ms
SFProIcons_medium.woff
124 ms
SFProIcons_regular.woff
126 ms
SFProIcons_light.woff
126 ms
webexpicons_text-ce6ff493b5fcdd0a6b6545a6a51a9db6.woff
54 ms
webexpicons_thin.woff
69 ms
webexpicons_ultralight.woff
69 ms
appleicons_text.woff
117 ms
appleicons_thin.woff
117 ms
appleicons_ultralight.woff
116 ms
webexpicons_thin.ttf
62 ms
webexpicons_ultralight.ttf
61 ms
mirror.app.link accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
mirror.app.link best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
mirror.app.link SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mirror.app.link can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mirror.app.link main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mirror.app.link
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mirror App. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: