Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

1778go.com

www.1778go.com-官网首页

Page Load Speed

23 sec in total

First Response

8.3 sec

Resources Loaded

14.5 sec

Page Rendered

176 ms

About Website

Visit 1778go.com now to see the best up-to-date 1778 Go content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 1778go.com

买域名找4.cn-angel.+地球angel4cn

Visit 1778go.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 1778go.com page load time and found that the first response time was 8.3 sec and then it took 14.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

1778go.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.117

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.6 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

1778go.com

8327 ms

common.css

129 ms

style.css

131 ms

c.js

1257 ms

f.js

1251 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original 1778go.com, 23% (9 requests) were made to Pos.baidu.com and 13% (5 requests) were made to Cpro.baidustatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.3 sec) belongs to the original domain 1778go.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 272.8 kB (47%)

Content Size

578.2 kB

After Optimization

305.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 1778go.com main page is 578.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 288.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 30.6 kB

  • Original 41.1 kB
  • After minification 40.5 kB
  • After compression 10.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.6 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 29.8 kB

  • Original 238.1 kB
  • After minification 208.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, 1778 Go needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 204.5 kB

  • Original 288.8 kB
  • After minification 288.7 kB
  • After compression 84.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 204.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 10.3 kB
  • After minification 8.7 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 1778go.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (34%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 1778 Go. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

1778go.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

1778go.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

1778go.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    GBK

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 1778go.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that 1778go.com main page’s claimed encoding is gbk. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 1778 Go. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: