Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

2016dreamticket.com

2016 Dream Ticket | Whom would you like to see as the GOP presidential nominee in 2016?

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

183 ms

Resources Loaded

694 ms

Page Rendered

229 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing 2016 Dream Ticket content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 2016dreamticket.com

Make your voice heard! Select your 2016 presidential and vice presidential candidates today!

Visit 2016dreamticket.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 2016dreamticket.com page load time and found that the first response time was 183 ms and then it took 923 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

2016dreamticket.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

2016dreamticket.com

183 ms

restxt960.css

44 ms

formalize.css

82 ms

style.css

84 ms

buttons.js

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original 2016dreamticket.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (198 ms) belongs to the original domain 2016dreamticket.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 190.0 kB (28%)

Content Size

671.8 kB

After Optimization

481.8 kB

In fact, the total size of 2016dreamticket.com main page is 671.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 412.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 12.5 kB
  • After minification 11.8 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 15.4 kB

  • Original 412.3 kB
  • After minification 396.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 2016 Dream Ticket images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 149.0 kB

  • Original 225.3 kB
  • After minification 224.7 kB
  • After compression 76.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 149.0 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 16.9 kB

  • Original 21.7 kB
  • After minification 16.8 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 2016dreamticket.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (53%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 2016 Dream Ticket. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

2016dreamticket.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 2016dreamticket.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 2016dreamticket.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 2016 Dream Ticket. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: