Access alive.com. alive magazine

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value32.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value68,470 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value91.6 s

0/100

10%

alive.com

218 ms

www.alive.com

2059 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

97 ms

widget.css

169 ms

menu-image.css

169 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Alive.com, 24% (24 requests) were made to D2mdn1s78c9h86.cloudfront.net and 15% (15 requests) were made to Ads.alive.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Alive.com.

Content Size

5.0 MB

After Optimization

3.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Alive.com main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 66.3 kB

Original 83.9 kB
After minification 79.5 kB
After compression 17.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 364.7 kB

Original 4.0 MB
After minification 3.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Alive images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 550.2 kB

Original 771.6 kB
After minification 736.6 kB
After compression 221.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 550.2 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 105.6 kB

Original 130.3 kB
After minification 128.2 kB
After compression 24.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Alive.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 105.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Alive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.