Access ami.im. Публикация научных статей - Агентство международных исследований

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

71/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value510 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

ami.im

527 ms

ami.im

1003 ms

jquery.min.js

149 ms

loader.js

203 ms

parallax.min.js

308 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Ami.im, 5% (2 requests) were made to Web.webformscr.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Ami.im.

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Ami.im main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 125.8 kB

Original 153.3 kB
After minification 149.3 kB
After compression 27.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 70.7 kB

Original 1.2 MB
After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ami images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 198.3 kB

Original 436.1 kB
After minification 436.1 kB
After compression 237.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 198.3 kB or 45% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 611 B

Original 91.4 kB
After minification 91.4 kB
After compression 90.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ami.im has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ami. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.