2.2 sec in total
310 ms
1.6 sec
333 ms
Visit mmbr.asm.org now to see the best up-to-date Mmbr Asm content for China and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mmbr.asm.org
Visit mmbr.asm.orgWe analyzed Mmbr.asm.org page load time and found that the first response time was 310 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
mmbr.asm.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.1 s
0/100
10%
Value16.4 s
0/100
25%
Value35.2 s
0/100
10%
Value3,030 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.111
87/100
15%
Value28.7 s
0/100
10%
310 ms
118 ms
125 ms
123 ms
127 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Mmbr.asm.org, 9% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (310 ms) belongs to the original domain Mmbr.asm.org.
Page size can be reduced by 500.5 kB (69%)
729.2 kB
228.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Mmbr.asm.org main page is 729.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 353.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.9 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mmbr Asm images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 189.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 189.7 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 290.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mmbr.asm.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 290.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (66%)
53
18
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mmbr Asm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
mmbr.asm.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mmbr.asm.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mmbr.asm.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mmbr.asm.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
mmbr.asm.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mmbr Asm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: