Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

birebir.com

- Sanal Ma�aza

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

565 ms

Resources Loaded

704 ms

Page Rendered

51 ms

About Website

Visit birebir.com now to see the best up-to-date Birebir content for Turkey and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about birebir.com

Visit birebir.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Birebir.com page load time and found that the first response time was 565 ms and then it took 755 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

birebir.com performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

birebir.com

565 ms

birebir.css

110 ms

analytics.js

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Birebir.com, 33% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (565 ms) belongs to the original domain Birebir.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.4 kB (17%)

Content Size

26.7 kB

After Optimization

22.3 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Birebir.com main page is 26.7 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 21.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 1.6 kB
  • After minification 949 B
  • After compression 559 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 655 B, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.0 kB or 65% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 4.1 kB
  • After minification 3.3 kB
  • After compression 809 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Birebir.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Birebir. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

birebir.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

birebir.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

birebir.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1254

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Birebir.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Birebir.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1254. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Birebir. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: