Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 57

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

Page Load Speed

14 sec in total

First Response

3.4 sec

Resources Loaded

10.2 sec

Page Rendered

379 ms

About Website

Visit boardscan.com now to see the best up-to-date Boardscan content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about boardscan.com

شرکت برداسکن آسیا پیشرو در ارائه راهکارهای خرده فروشی نمایندگی انحصاری محصولات Tyson و Sato

Visit boardscan.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Boardscan.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.4 sec and then it took 10.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Boardscan.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

boardscan.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.2 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

boardscan.com

3390 ms

ck

242 ms

ck

246 ms

ck

438 ms

k2.css

634 ms

Our browser made a total of 132 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (118 requests) were addressed to the original Boardscan.com, 3% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googlesads.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Boardscan.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (55%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Boardscan.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 892.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 136.9 kB

  • Original 160.1 kB
  • After minification 131.0 kB
  • After compression 23.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.0 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 136.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 63.3 kB

  • Original 892.2 kB
  • After minification 828.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Boardscan images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 556.1 kB

  • Original 780.5 kB
  • After minification 710.6 kB
  • After compression 224.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 556.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 685.7 kB

  • Original 808.4 kB
  • After minification 731.4 kB
  • After compression 122.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Boardscan.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 685.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (46%)

Requests Now

126

After Optimization

68

The browser has sent 126 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Boardscan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

boardscan.com accessibility score

57

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

boardscan.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

boardscan.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    FA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Boardscan.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Persian language. Our system also found out that Boardscan.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Boardscan. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: