Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

bytecellar.com

Byte Cellar - The Vintage Computing Weblog

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

About Website

Visit bytecellar.com now to see the best up-to-date Byte Cellar content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bytecellar.com

The Vintage Computing Weblog

Visit bytecellar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bytecellar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bytecellar.com performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

57/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

76/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.bytecellar.com

1049 ms

style.css

29 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

31 ms

mQxCmi9lYT4

83 ms

bytecellar_logo_upd.jpg

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Bytecellar.com, 34% (14 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Bytecellar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 540.4 kB (17%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Bytecellar.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 64.4 kB

  • Original 86.9 kB
  • After minification 83.9 kB
  • After compression 22.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.4 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 106.8 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Byte Cellar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 145.7 kB

  • Original 244.1 kB
  • After minification 244.0 kB
  • After compression 98.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 145.7 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 223.4 kB

  • Original 269.8 kB
  • After minification 262.8 kB
  • After compression 46.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bytecellar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 223.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (13%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

35

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Byte Cellar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

bytecellar.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

bytecellar.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

bytecellar.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bytecellar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bytecellar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Byte Cellar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: