Report Summary

  • 5

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 55% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

charlesfox.co.uk

Kryolan - Professional Make-up

Page Load Speed

35.8 sec in total

First Response

519 ms

Resources Loaded

35.1 sec

Page Rendered

133 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Charlesfox content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about charlesfox.co.uk

Kryolan is the professional make-up brand loved and used by make-up artists worldwide, producing high-end make-up, including the award winning Dermacolor, Supracolor, Aquacolor and High Definition ran...

Visit charlesfox.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Charlesfox.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 519 ms and then it took 35.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

charlesfox.co.uk performance score

5

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,350 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.321

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.0 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

uk.kryolan.com

519 ms

uk.kryolan.com

211 ms

webfonts.css

104 ms

css_r7pd3u-ioQiefZF23bPTGJu8yvARI_vHuh-63Wpf4mc.css

529 ms

css_wUdBaMuCYsFizlCxD2c6Aghzr2j7bcqetGPmXH3IjIg.css

645 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Charlesfox.co.uk, 34% (26 requests) were made to Uk.kryolan.com and 16% (12 requests) were made to Static2.kryolan.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source Static3.kryolan.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 185.1 kB (5%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Charlesfox.co.uk main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 122.3 kB

  • Original 143.3 kB
  • After minification 137.9 kB
  • After compression 21.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 55.0 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Charlesfox images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 162.3 kB
  • After minification 162.3 kB
  • After compression 154.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 235 B

  • Original 38.1 kB
  • After minification 38.1 kB
  • After compression 37.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Charlesfox.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (11%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

58

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Charlesfox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

charlesfox.co.uk accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role] values are not valid

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

charlesfox.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

charlesfox.co.uk SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Charlesfox.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Charlesfox.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Charlesfox. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: