Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

checkupdown.com

Home - UpDo-Check

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

86 ms

Resources Loaded

676 ms

Page Rendered

803 ms

About Website

Welcome to checkupdown.com homepage info - get ready to check Check Updown best content for Turkey right away, or after learning these important things about checkupdown.com

A modern website can contain the following types of content: text, images, audio and video. However, at the dawn of the Internet, bandwidth was limited

Visit checkupdown.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Checkupdown.com page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

checkupdown.com performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.1 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

checkupdown.com

86 ms

www.checkupdown.com

178 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

30 ms

style.min.css

65 ms

styles.css

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Checkupdown.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (178 ms) belongs to the original domain Checkupdown.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 71.4 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

961.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Checkupdown.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 917.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 54.5 kB

  • Original 65.9 kB
  • After minification 58.1 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 13.4 kB

  • Original 917.4 kB
  • After minification 904.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Check Updown images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 49.4 kB
  • After minification 49.4 kB
  • After compression 45.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Checkupdown.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (39%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Check Updown. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

checkupdown.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

checkupdown.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

checkupdown.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Checkupdown.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Checkupdown.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Check Updown. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: