Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

citria.net

Marketing Consulting | Citria - Brand Consulting Agency

Page Load Speed

17.7 sec in total

First Response

8.7 sec

Resources Loaded

8.9 sec

Page Rendered

107 ms

About Website

Visit citria.net now to see the best up-to-date Citria content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about citria.net

Helping business navigate the change from B2B to B2C, Marketing Consulting, Brand Development, Package Design and Websites.

Visit citria.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Citria.net page load time and found that the first response time was 8.7 sec and then it took 9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

citria.net performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

92/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.525

14/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.citria.net

8727 ms

minified.js

31 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

27 ms

polyfill.min.js

1208 ms

8875.e26292eb.bundle.min.js

5 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Citria.net, 69% (11 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 13% (2 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Citria.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 216.9 kB (39%)

Content Size

553.5 kB

After Optimization

336.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Citria.net main page is 553.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 282.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 212.6 kB

  • Original 282.0 kB
  • After minification 279.8 kB
  • After compression 69.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 212.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 271.5 kB
  • After minification 271.5 kB
  • After compression 267.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (92%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Citria. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

citria.net accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

citria.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

citria.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Citria.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Citria.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: