Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

clinique.de

Clinique | Offizieller Online-Shop | Einfach. Sicher. Wirksam. Allergiegetestet. 100% Parfümfrei.

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

233 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

977 ms

About Website

Welcome to clinique.de homepage info - get ready to check Clinique best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about clinique.de

Shoppe im offiziellen Clinique Online-Shop für Hautpflege, Makeup, Düfte und Geschenke. Ab 25€ versandkostenfrei. Gratis Proben bei jeder Bestellung. Allergiegetestet. Dermatologisch getestet. 100% Pa...

Visit clinique.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Clinique.de page load time and found that the first response time was 233 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

clinique.de performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.4 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,800 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.119

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.1 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.clinique.de

233 ms

css_cfOMT6XIniXXja2kUbvROl_YTvTHblxAnbZLoM8dI3U2.css

155 ms

css_ZIsat4uy0C3kvlimVfr2RyDieXMcKBqtRS5a_z_jvek2.css

48 ms

css_ODEZt9SQDvsJmEyMeYjqB9Ow1TcVbMgeEd3TRAxKV3U2.css

46 ms

css_qftzPCDyfX8IpZxpCZ8YH1xLjRGWnYC0C3a2_EdwJdw2.css

158 ms

Our browser made a total of 141 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (133 requests) were addressed to the original Clinique.de, 1% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net and 1% (1 request) were made to Js.sentry-cdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Clinique.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (38%)

Content Size

4.4 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Clinique.de main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 497.8 kB

  • Original 622.6 kB
  • After minification 622.5 kB
  • After compression 124.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 497.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Clinique images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB
  • After compression 716.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 143.8 kB

  • Original 353.1 kB
  • After minification 352.7 kB
  • After compression 209.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clinique.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 143.8 kB or 41% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 93 (68%)

Requests Now

137

After Optimization

44

The browser has sent 137 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clinique. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 87 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

clinique.de accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

clinique.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

clinique.de SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clinique.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clinique.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Clinique. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: